npub1p0wyn67cd9cm80vj6ds5crpss5sg76jplv32v6mn23szgexu3yxqq822r5 (npub1p0w…22r5)
Nobody writes on a blank slate. We already know the Code of Hammurabi was based on precedent, because that's kind of how laws work.
But I already know that many courts have made the decision based on the argument. The fact that the argument is successful does not necessarily make it a good one.
(Citizens United was a successful argument.)
We've seen many a populist and inhuman argument which is absolutely terrible, and yet has succeeded through a combination of the three judicial factors most well-known among the rich - grift, thrift, and swift.
(Or bribery, sloth, and expedience, if you prefer.)
This is one more step towards a place where parental rights are the sole and singular argument against the rights of the child. And we have seen that increasing over the last few years. It's not in full bloom yet, but the flowers are sprouting.
Okay, last edit: I don't think DeWine was influenced as heavily by care staff and families as he claims. OOC, sus.
Jennifer Kayla | Theogrin 🦊 /
npub1fj…0cjmr
2023-12-29 16:51:00
in reply to nevent1q…h58d
Author Public Key
npub1fjarz5jc055as8xsgl5luxvspayjmc8sm6fph07ehzg7txprmppqn0cjmrPublished at
2023-12-29 16:51:00Event JSON
{
"id": "b75eb19592607e885a303290735fdf5d4c73c3076992b768f79a6dc4691a95df",
"pubkey": "4cba3152587d29d81cd047e9fe19900f492de0f0de921bbfd9b891e59823d842",
"created_at": 1703868660,
"kind": 1,
"tags": [
[
"p",
"0bdc49ebd86971b3bd92d3614c0c3085208f6a41fb22a66b7354602464dc890c",
"wss://relay.mostr.pub"
],
[
"p",
"eddababc906fdb7a0d1c75ae227442a9e64932f51f0d19ca245e311481f9c461",
"wss://relay.mostr.pub"
],
[
"e",
"9fb14b070d9cdec2fbee0190f2f0ab7832e02f3039e3f61bc6962958f89deb10",
"wss://relay.mostr.pub",
"reply"
],
[
"proxy",
"https://chaosfem.tw/users/theogrin/statuses/111664736535421646",
"activitypub"
]
],
"content": "nostr:npub1p0wyn67cd9cm80vj6ds5crpss5sg76jplv32v6mn23szgexu3yxqq822r5 \n\nNobody writes on a blank slate. We already know the Code of Hammurabi was based on precedent, because that's kind of how laws work.\n\nBut I already know that many courts have made the decision based on the argument. The fact that the argument is successful does not necessarily make it a good one.\n\n(Citizens United was a successful argument.)\n\nWe've seen many a populist and inhuman argument which is absolutely terrible, and yet has succeeded through a combination of the three judicial factors most well-known among the rich - grift, thrift, and swift.\n\n(Or bribery, sloth, and expedience, if you prefer.)\n\nThis is one more step towards a place where parental rights are the sole and singular argument against the rights of the child. And we have seen that increasing over the last few years. It's not in full bloom yet, but the flowers are sprouting.\n\nOkay, last edit: I don't think DeWine was influenced as heavily by care staff and families as he claims. OOC, sus.",
"sig": "8825e0aee4b9f69207f289ca67623936d3c9acdfe9efb2194f96778492612b28aa33e3012b0215d82e69617dbb004efe48a00948435b58755b5fad9b2c47daf9"
}