📅 Original date posted:2022-07-27
📝 Original message:On Wed, 27 Jul 2022 at 00:28, Andrew Chow <achow101-lists at achow101.com>
wrote:
> However I don't see why this couldn't generalize to any sized tuples. As
> long as the tuples are all the same length, and the limit is one tuple per
> key expression, then we don't get any combinatorial blowup issues.
>
I think it's worthwhile to generalize for any sized tuples. I don't have
any existing particular use case in mind, because BIP-44, BIP-84, etc. are
fine with just using <0;1>, but there might be some upcoming standards in
the future that will want to introduce more sub-paths.
--
Best Regards / S pozdravom,
Pavol "stick" Rusnak
Co-Founder, SatoshiLabs
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/attachments/20220727/d71a012a/attachment.html>;
Pavol Rusnak [ARCHIVE] /
npub1wc…3hnuq
2023-06-07 23:12:16
in reply to nevent1q…rwmr
Author Public Key
npub1wccnjljxnarlx564vuc37hmuzuffurljevjnmuq4u0vjmh7e933sn3hnuqPublished at
2023-06-07 23:12:16Event JSON
{
"id": "b725a9319e881ea2d48ac8c46ae0776f0cf6e90614ab5a19cfa63fd337a4bc3c",
"pubkey": "7631397e469f47f3535567311f5f7c17129e0ff2cb253df015e3d92ddfd92c63",
"created_at": 1686179536,
"kind": 1,
"tags": [
[
"e",
"4bbeff45fe327dd8a25e73531abd515e2a94cabab69a434340c764e33537b7b4",
"",
"root"
],
[
"e",
"39915067b32cc728aee14d2b96d98e5881e3460487a55a53d0cf69a468b21c9a",
"",
"reply"
],
[
"p",
"4a273da3c9ab85c096f859e6ca066d2fdfe762406cadc2f4d58aa75468aca8d0"
]
],
"content": "📅 Original date posted:2022-07-27\n📝 Original message:On Wed, 27 Jul 2022 at 00:28, Andrew Chow \u003cachow101-lists at achow101.com\u003e\nwrote:\n\n\u003e However I don't see why this couldn't generalize to any sized tuples. As\n\u003e long as the tuples are all the same length, and the limit is one tuple per\n\u003e key expression, then we don't get any combinatorial blowup issues.\n\u003e\n\nI think it's worthwhile to generalize for any sized tuples. I don't have\nany existing particular use case in mind, because BIP-44, BIP-84, etc. are\nfine with just using \u003c0;1\u003e, but there might be some upcoming standards in\nthe future that will want to introduce more sub-paths.\n\n\n-- \nBest Regards / S pozdravom,\n\nPavol \"stick\" Rusnak\nCo-Founder, SatoshiLabs\n-------------- next part --------------\nAn HTML attachment was scrubbed...\nURL: \u003chttp://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/attachments/20220727/d71a012a/attachment.html\u003e",
"sig": "be0cf60afedbf2cc85fda154e338c383cafdabe2e62652f662fa6869a1563cfb858a22016d0461dd2f6da357fb0d7200b34c05881b978816bac2738044c6432c"
}