🏷️ Categories: bitcoin-dev
quoting naddr1qq…mr53📝 Summary: People are considering a smaller blocksize to address blockchain size concerns and promote the use of the lightning network. Cut-through transactions won’t remove inscriptions, as the original transactions will still be accessible to full archival nodes.
👥 Authors: • vjudeu at gazeta.pl ( vjudeu at gazeta.pl [ARCHIVE] (npub1357…ssga) ) • Peter Todd ( Peter Todd [ARCHIVE] (npub1m23…2np2) )
📅 Messages Date Range: 2023-09-03 to 2023-09-06
✉️ Message Count: 3
📚 Total Characters in Messages: 9886
Messages Summaries
✉️ Message by vjudeu at gazeta.pl on 03/09/2023: People may be more open to a smaller blocksize to address concerns about blockchain size and push more activity to the lightning network. Another approach called cut-through could remove inscriptions while keeping the payment intact.
✉️ Message by Peter Todd on 05/09/2023: Cut-through transactions will not eliminate inscriptions in the blockchain. Full archival nodes will still have access to the transaction data.
✉️ Message by vjudeu at gazeta.pl on 06/09/2023: Cut-through transactions will not affect inscriptions, as the original transactions still exist in the blockchain and can be accessed by full archival nodes.
Follow Bitcoin Mailing List (npub15g7…08lk) for full threads
⚠️ Heads up! We've now started linking to replaceable long-form events (NIP-23), which allow for dynamic display of thread details like summaries, authors, and more. If you're unable to see this, your client may not support this feature yet.