📅 Original date posted:2013-10-25
📝 Original message:Mike Hearn has been lobbying for an "error" message in the Bitcoin p2p
protocol for years (at least since the "ban peers if they send us garbage"
denial-of-service mitigation code was pull-requested). This came up again
with my proposed "smartfee" changes, which would drop low-priority or
low-fee transactions.
In short, giving peers feedback about why their blocks or transactions are
dropped or why they are being banned should help interoperability between
different implementations, and will give SPV (simplified payment
verification) clients feedback when their transactions are rejected due to
insufficient priority or fees.
See the gist for details, I'm looking for feedback and planning on
implementing this before circling back to finish the 'smart fee' work:
https://gist.github.com/gavinandresen/7079034
--
--
Gavin Andresen
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/attachments/20131026/86e9867d/attachment.html>;
Gavin Andresen [ARCHIVE] /
npub1s4…d44kw
2023-06-07 15:08:08
in reply to nevent1q…rrd5
Author Public Key
npub1s4lj77xuzcu7wy04afcr487f0r3za0f8n2775xrpkld2sv639mjqsd44kwPublished at
2023-06-07 15:08:08Event JSON
{
"id": "b768bb5bc072c09cbf4c6226d5b69a85d69a129510120cd109d7b1fb6c6bcab8",
"pubkey": "857f2f78dc1639e711f5ea703a9fc978e22ebd279abdea1861b7daa833512ee4",
"created_at": 1686150488,
"kind": 1,
"tags": [
[
"e",
"3817326e0aa3f4776a8ff8e7526de3607739981db781c73ec645db4eafebe42c",
"",
"reply"
],
[
"p",
"a23dbf6c6cc83e14cc3df4e56cc71845f611908084cfe620e83e40c06ccdd3d0"
]
],
"content": "📅 Original date posted:2013-10-25\n📝 Original message:Mike Hearn has been lobbying for an \"error\" message in the Bitcoin p2p\nprotocol for years (at least since the \"ban peers if they send us garbage\"\ndenial-of-service mitigation code was pull-requested). This came up again\nwith my proposed \"smartfee\" changes, which would drop low-priority or\nlow-fee transactions.\n\nIn short, giving peers feedback about why their blocks or transactions are\ndropped or why they are being banned should help interoperability between\ndifferent implementations, and will give SPV (simplified payment\nverification) clients feedback when their transactions are rejected due to\ninsufficient priority or fees.\n\nSee the gist for details, I'm looking for feedback and planning on\nimplementing this before circling back to finish the 'smart fee' work:\n\n https://gist.github.com/gavinandresen/7079034\n\n-- \n--\nGavin Andresen\n-------------- next part --------------\nAn HTML attachment was scrubbed...\nURL: \u003chttp://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/attachments/20131026/86e9867d/attachment.html\u003e",
"sig": "aa3538bc8c64844c28dc543ba814ac945bcc2035a27f45c3347f16732aadf65751023e4f6b9e2b7184e8905d6f3139487ef115f148083916d62178abc516aa96"
}