nprofile1qy2hwumn8ghj7un9d3shjtnddaehgu3wwp6kyqpql79kjgsep8y4h3rvhrmqlazg0qtj0h0h00u35yc6mxaxuldgfn8q0q36af (nprofile…36af) nprofile1qy2hwumn8ghj7un9d3shjtnddaehgu3wwp6kyqpqaxmrvkyyh6muj6jcd3md7j0zu0z78hlr0uh7huu5v5lgs98y0yksa2unmw (nprofile…unmw)
> You say we don't have a free market now, I guess you refer to the United States - don't know about all places, but I feel a purely free market capitalism is practically unachievable unless you go into an anarchist society.
You could, but no one should want that. As I said this goes back to my comment about pure ideologies, they are almost always bad. Ideologies are meant to be principles, default ideas that work **most** of the time, but no ideaology should ever be applied in the absolute.
Nor does capitalism (or any ideology) require itself to be applied absolutely. Capitalism as a principle applied most of the time, and other principles used where they apply is completely in line with capitalism, and should be the goal of a capitalist.
> I feel the Oxford dictionary definition...
as I said words dont have a single definition, that is certainly one of them. It is distinctly different than free-market which is another definition. Since private ownership and free market are two halves of the same coin I find the distinction largely irrelevant. If the market isnt free then you dont truly completely own your products since someone else can force you to sell it as a price other than what it is worth. You dont truly own a thing if you cant choose when and how to sell it.