📅 Original date posted:2016-09-23
📝 Original message:I believe Bitcoin currently enjoys the property that during an "innocent"
re-org, i.e. a reorg in which no affected transactions are being double
spent, all affected transactions can always eventually get replayed, so
long as the re-org depth is less than 100.
My concern with this proposed operation is that it would destroy this
property.
On Fri, Sep 23, 2016 at 5:57 AM, Luke Dashjr via bitcoin-dev <
bitcoin-dev at lists.linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
> This BIP describes a new opcode (OP_CHECKBLOCKATHEIGHT) for the Bitcoin
> scripting system to address reissuing bitcoin transactions when the coins
> they
> spend have been conflicted/double-spent.
>
> https://github.com/luke-jr/bips/blob/bip-cbah/bip-cbah.mediawiki
>
> Does this seem like a good idea/approach?
>
> Luke
> _______________________________________________
> bitcoin-dev mailing list
> bitcoin-dev at lists.linuxfoundation.org
> https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/attachments/20160923/21649e63/attachment.html>;
Russell O'Connor [ARCHIVE] /
npub1dw…8plrw
2023-06-07 17:53:34
in reply to nevent1q…8tcf
Author Public Key
npub1dw88wd5gqsqn6ufxhf9h03uk8087l7gfzdtez5csjlt6pupu4pwsj8plrwPublished at
2023-06-07 17:53:34Event JSON
{
"id": "b1f8ce31c51977079883b27513991fe6cb26ffad4c09ecba61b477a840519762",
"pubkey": "6b8e77368804013d7126ba4b77c7963bcfeff909135791531097d7a0f03ca85d",
"created_at": 1686160414,
"kind": 1,
"tags": [
[
"e",
"d18826815090afbadc28ae1d0b7b8b63e39dcc4ada4cb48ae90cd951a4779d15",
"",
"root"
],
[
"e",
"5d6b090ef382a2a7520a0507e909211247ffca6a3d71f0589cc88cbd4714a094",
"",
"reply"
],
[
"p",
"5a6d1f44482b67b5b0d30cc1e829b66a251f0dc99448377dbe3c5e0faf6c3803"
]
],
"content": "📅 Original date posted:2016-09-23\n📝 Original message:I believe Bitcoin currently enjoys the property that during an \"innocent\"\nre-org, i.e. a reorg in which no affected transactions are being double\nspent, all affected transactions can always eventually get replayed, so\nlong as the re-org depth is less than 100.\n\nMy concern with this proposed operation is that it would destroy this\nproperty.\n\nOn Fri, Sep 23, 2016 at 5:57 AM, Luke Dashjr via bitcoin-dev \u003c\nbitcoin-dev at lists.linuxfoundation.org\u003e wrote:\n\n\u003e This BIP describes a new opcode (OP_CHECKBLOCKATHEIGHT) for the Bitcoin\n\u003e scripting system to address reissuing bitcoin transactions when the coins\n\u003e they\n\u003e spend have been conflicted/double-spent.\n\u003e\n\u003e https://github.com/luke-jr/bips/blob/bip-cbah/bip-cbah.mediawiki\n\u003e\n\u003e Does this seem like a good idea/approach?\n\u003e\n\u003e Luke\n\u003e _______________________________________________\n\u003e bitcoin-dev mailing list\n\u003e bitcoin-dev at lists.linuxfoundation.org\n\u003e https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev\n\u003e\n-------------- next part --------------\nAn HTML attachment was scrubbed...\nURL: \u003chttp://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/attachments/20160923/21649e63/attachment.html\u003e",
"sig": "f7c0751aaa73d75a37a3af649225209962e2a35ede9133e5080fa3cc2ee189d7ce0d463a361411ec253174ec6a325518572494e1c7fff0f806297eabd261e344"
}