Event JSON
{
"id": "b02888174165353aec7f49db12632ddcd7ff1650d2254cdefbab935fbc8ff9c4",
"pubkey": "770280147157bdd557a2123e1807d12693b7dfd4a9ff82a0d4fb7adcd1058a3e",
"created_at": 1709314668,
"kind": 1,
"tags": [
[
"p",
"0b494d8345407787f42b791a4a6d3f7dd51a2af45798a51636435cf86eaae5e4",
"wss://relay.mostr.pub"
],
[
"p",
"58319fe1e93e75d18ca28a3b7cc43a21b7fb044f3641a9527da51f7033e4efa7",
"wss://relay.mostr.pub"
],
[
"e",
"c44771fca1c197c5302dc2c2a06e107e5f43a8dfa2e1a416dd1aa5f4898dafd3",
"wss://relay.mostr.pub",
"reply"
],
[
"proxy",
"https://mastodon.social/users/Radical_EgoCom/statuses/112021646122028156",
"activitypub"
]
],
"content": "nostr:npub1pdy5mq69gpmc0apt0ydy5mfl0h2352h527v2293kgdw0sm42uhjq9ujm0h \nCircular reasoning is invalid because it doesn't provide any new information or evidence to support a claim. Instead, it simply restates the claim in different words. This creates a logical fallacy because it assumes the conclusion to be true without offering independent justification. In essence, it's like saying \"A is true because A is true,\" which doesn't provide any valid reasoning or evidence. Therefore, circular reasoning fails to establish the validity of an argument.",
"sig": "098e5b27c6e2895911a8669e8bbbe232d1f69bb35d27763882b6faf9e0115bf92e8face5be61a82d7a3701a8219f0c9ce25edd6748e685887442539406757ff8"
}