Why Nostr? What is Njump?
2024-03-01 17:37:48
in reply to

☭ 𝗖 𝗔 𝗧 ☭ on Nostr: npub1pdy5m…ujm0h Circular reasoning is invalid because it doesn't provide any new ...


Circular reasoning is invalid because it doesn't provide any new information or evidence to support a claim. Instead, it simply restates the claim in different words. This creates a logical fallacy because it assumes the conclusion to be true without offering independent justification. In essence, it's like saying "A is true because A is true," which doesn't provide any valid reasoning or evidence. Therefore, circular reasoning fails to establish the validity of an argument.
Author Public Key
npub1wupgq9r3277a24azzglpsp73y6fm0h7548lc9gx5ldade5g93glqr0gjnd