Event JSON
{
"id": "b9f9c59d842c5e9487327331e276caa303f43b8b1df8b0c68e23cf4833faf56a",
"pubkey": "a297d2ef6a36a76aa5241cfc4c0ab5ab13e37ab15aaa46b48dabd8cc3ace895c",
"created_at": 1702769090,
"kind": 1,
"tags": [
[
"p",
"ed70906254c00a0ef3821462300351b71b3e6ade35539a9b212c61eff29745a3",
"wss://relay.mostr.pub"
],
[
"p",
"0ecb1c9b6fc91390ab51a5a39082f44c4abe0a19ad67c63b709d175ebf23e0f2",
"wss://relay.mostr.pub"
],
[
"e",
"8b87deada76977bf696245b2a50438421816569006319672a4c1601043e1b44c",
"wss://relay.mostr.pub",
"reply"
],
[
"proxy",
"https://mastodon.social/users/pervognsen/statuses/111592675087592177",
"activitypub"
]
],
"content": "nostr:npub1a4cfqcj5cq9qauuzz33rqq63kudnu6k7x4fe4xep93s7lu5hgk3szqt2kf Doyle's Sherlock Holmes stories are really bad about this but in a different direction than the Jack Reacher example. It's all about Holmes seizing on some hyper-specific, easily missed detail and pretending that you can reconstruct everything from that. I actually hate that way more and it's prevalent in a lot of criminal forensics in pop culture, e.g. blood spatter analysis in Dexter.",
"sig": "8055a6543f686cd60d8a3ff14f3ed3867e4887da35303e259f730bfd23dabc9bb5effeb3c2c9ae55449cbd723bf43fd4a6eabe6837e4217910bbf2996c97f5ff"
}
