Why Nostr? What is Njump?
2023-06-07 02:01:14
in reply to

John Smith [ARCHIVE] on Nostr: 📅 Original date posted:2011-07-02 🗒️ Summary of this message: CMake is ...

📅 Original date posted:2011-07-02
🗒️ Summary of this message: CMake is suggested as a better build system than autotools due to its cross-platform support, clearer syntax, and faster speed.
📝 Original message:Also important: it supports cross compiling:

http://www.cmake.org/Wiki/CMake_Cross_Compiling

JS

On Sat, Jul 2, 2011 at 7:29 AM, John Smith <witchspace81 at gmail.com> wrote:

> Hello,
>
> Why again did we choose for autotools as future build system instead of
> cmake?
>
> - CMake generates native build scripts for Make (all platforms), XCode,
> Visual Studio. Autoconf only does Make.
>
> - CMake has a clearer syntax, m4/autotools is very convoluted
>
> - CMake is very fast
>
> - CMake is supported natively in Qt Creator in the QT SDK, and is used by
> many other KDE/QT as well as other open source applications. Many people
> discourage the use of autotools for new projects.
>
> A CMake build system for bitcoin is already integrated into rpcminer,
> available here:
>
> http://luke.dashjr.org/programs/bitcoin/w/puddinpop-bitcoin-pool.git/tree
>
> JS
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/attachments/20110702/9df8688f/attachment.html>;
Author Public Key
npub1e4lupyw4vuuhfsmt726ud69555re66pph90kwx0afpt346e9k7zsd4jafl