📅 Original date posted:2014-04-23
📝 Original message:On Wed, Apr 23, 2014 at 1:39 PM, Warren Togami Jr. <wtogami at gmail.com> wrote:
> If you are
> a rare user who needs Bitcoin-Qt on an incompatible system you can at least
> build it from source.
Tails users usually can't really build it from source— talks is a live
boot mostly stateless linux distribution for privacy applications.
It's really good in general.
I agree that we shouldn't be statically linking QT on linux generally
(due to things like theming), though maybe we could just have the
build process dump out a seperate extra static QT binary just for
these other cases? I feel like the work maintaining it would be less
than what we've had in answering questions/complaints about it.
Gregory Maxwell [ARCHIVE] /
npub1f2…crwet
2023-06-07 15:19:19
in reply to nevent1q…w4zp
Author Public Key
npub1f2nvlx49er5c7sqa43src6ssyp6snd4qwvtkwm5avc2l84cs84esecrwetSeen on
wss://relay.nostr.bandPublished at
2023-06-07 15:19:19Event JSON
{
"id": "bb71584205d6444338f5de1155e4e24121aea33de24213814b758b3182c32611",
"pubkey": "4aa6cf9aa5c8e98f401dac603c6a10207509b6a07317676e9d6615f3d7103d73",
"created_at": 1686151159,
"kind": 1,
"tags": [
[
"e",
"32a9c22b7e6c52f4ef70051f92bdc18644b13f1c93ed2a5c2cefd9e927d70b7e",
"",
"root"
],
[
"e",
"3cacc6868d245d4b30b8de00e8bc346f9e11b572f158886a71c0ca7f8f4ede75",
"",
"reply"
],
[
"p",
"e8c5be8658921444c6e1ceb34bd5fedce2326b4a65f72bb439a2d2b54f3fbb4b"
]
],
"content": "📅 Original date posted:2014-04-23\n📝 Original message:On Wed, Apr 23, 2014 at 1:39 PM, Warren Togami Jr. \u003cwtogami at gmail.com\u003e wrote:\n\u003e If you are\n\u003e a rare user who needs Bitcoin-Qt on an incompatible system you can at least\n\u003e build it from source.\n\nTails users usually can't really build it from source— talks is a live\nboot mostly stateless linux distribution for privacy applications.\nIt's really good in general.\n\nI agree that we shouldn't be statically linking QT on linux generally\n(due to things like theming), though maybe we could just have the\nbuild process dump out a seperate extra static QT binary just for\nthese other cases? I feel like the work maintaining it would be less\nthan what we've had in answering questions/complaints about it.",
"sig": "badc72c2aa683bc81995b76b5282af831e24e95f8ca5bfa5099e4f28d0027ffb702876000a479a5a3cfb8bcb04366525dfd991fe656d7d4bf4ad06d5cf7b45ce"
}