Event JSON
{
"id": "bb25ae7c6053d7f496e17466665520e2ba347729c671da17a8bf12dc7cd05804",
"pubkey": "3c506acef8a1b75c0ab9a0bb49628d1aac5450b1a5ae47e6b17a9f2f9cf661fd",
"created_at": 1689381971,
"kind": 1,
"tags": [
[
"p",
"55efd5c4a7f4280b1aedc5b07bbf0dd2a6c6fd128e9830adb9d951d731a48b18",
"wss://relay.mostr.pub"
],
[
"p",
"8d6d50c5baec6309296c4f0357cae0395fd2630595613c20424503d3d96d3104",
"wss://relay.mostr.pub"
],
[
"e",
"cf20627e67c3627baff47ae2c52fb9bc23b6e948b03e33bfb300872aded2840d",
"wss://relay.mostr.pub",
"reply"
],
[
"mostr",
"https://mstdn.social/users/paulknightly/statuses/110715336874566455"
]
],
"content": "nostr:npub12hhat3987s5qkxhdckc8h0cd62nvdlgj36vrptdem9gawvdy3vvq4dkdkk There is the argument that if NASA eliminated their human spaceflight program and reallocated that same budget to planetary science that we would be able to saturate the solar system with high-return robotic missions, if not from the individual capability or science return of any one mission, than through sheer volume and the mass accumulation of results from smaller targeted missions, and I would tend to agree with that. (3/x)",
"sig": "c8cd635c074af982539f9efd5427b4110906286fabb8d55ced876abf3e3bd9413b1a934aeb99b9d829c444357e510c9be43ffff22dfff319c96bb97d49f0b19a"
}