📅 Original date posted:2016-02-02
📝 Original message:I think it would be helpful to clarify this in the list documentation.
Right now there's a bunch of conflicting information.
https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev states:
"*Greylisting Notice*
Your first post to this list may be delayed by 5+ minutes due to Greylisting
<https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Greylisting>;. Subsequent posts should go
through without delay."
https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/2015-October/011591.html
states:
"Everyone starts moderated, and the mod bit gets cleared as they post. It
gets set again if someone notices or reports a violation."
On Tue, Feb 2, 2016 at 11:12 AM, Peter Todd <pete at petertodd.org> wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 02, 2016 at 09:41:35AM -0800, Toby Padilla wrote:
> > Then the moderation is being unevenly applied. Luke commented against my
> > BIP multiple times right after it was published but it took hours for my
> > responses to go through and I had to track people down on IRC to ask
> about
> > it:
> >
> >
> http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/2016-January/thread.html
>
> Keep in mind that actual human beings need to hit the approve button on
> your posts; quite likely Luke happened to respond when those humans were
> available, and you didn't. I personally had to do the exact same thing
> the other day with one of my posts.
>
> Moderation is an unfortunate thing to need, but this list is read by
> literally hundreds of busy people, many of whome have had to unsubscribe
> at various points in the past due to a lack of moderation. I wish we had
> a better solution, but that's what we have. We're also not along in
> using fairly agressive moderation, for example the
> cryptography at metzdowd.com mailing list where Bitcoin was originally
> announced uses manual approval moderation on all messages as well;
> there's also an unmoderated offshoot of it, cryptography at randombit.net
>
> (and feel free to start an unmoderated version of bitcoin-dev!)
>
> --
> https://petertodd.org 'peter'[:-1]@petertodd.org
> 000000000000000008320874843f282f554aa2436290642fcfa81e5a01d78698
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/attachments/20160202/9808fdc5/attachment.html>;
Toby Padilla [ARCHIVE] /
npub1m9…huekt
2023-06-07 17:48:27
in reply to nevent1q…vpkw
Author Public Key
npub1m99yqj0pat7mwzsdczyn28z84ce47adngzqp9kzft4gc3xke52fqqhuektPublished at
2023-06-07 17:48:27Event JSON
{
"id": "bb65eae9e93b965e04aca725e0851606e9189ea72f8a8763cf34fbbc801be460",
"pubkey": "d94a4049e1eafdb70a0dc089351c47ae335f75b3408012d8495d51889ad9a292",
"created_at": 1686160107,
"kind": 1,
"tags": [
[
"e",
"e6ad981b1892ac87a5c86fa13a75e0b0a362e90adcdcbc91667d3a8c4dc867cc",
"",
"root"
],
[
"e",
"21938df8d459ff1bb58b60865eae13dbd32bfc0eb6aa2dd40a86e378b402d62c",
"",
"reply"
],
[
"p",
"daa2fc676a25e3b5b45644540bcbd1e1168b111427cd0e3cf19c56194fb231aa"
]
],
"content": "📅 Original date posted:2016-02-02\n📝 Original message:I think it would be helpful to clarify this in the list documentation.\nRight now there's a bunch of conflicting information.\n\nhttps://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev states:\n\n\"*Greylisting Notice*\nYour first post to this list may be delayed by 5+ minutes due to Greylisting\n\u003chttps://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Greylisting\u003e. Subsequent posts should go\nthrough without delay.\"\n\nhttps://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/2015-October/011591.html\nstates:\n\n\"Everyone starts moderated, and the mod bit gets cleared as they post. It\ngets set again if someone notices or reports a violation.\"\n\nOn Tue, Feb 2, 2016 at 11:12 AM, Peter Todd \u003cpete at petertodd.org\u003e wrote:\n\n\u003e On Tue, Feb 02, 2016 at 09:41:35AM -0800, Toby Padilla wrote:\n\u003e \u003e Then the moderation is being unevenly applied. Luke commented against my\n\u003e \u003e BIP multiple times right after it was published but it took hours for my\n\u003e \u003e responses to go through and I had to track people down on IRC to ask\n\u003e about\n\u003e \u003e it:\n\u003e \u003e\n\u003e \u003e\n\u003e http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/2016-January/thread.html\n\u003e\n\u003e Keep in mind that actual human beings need to hit the approve button on\n\u003e your posts; quite likely Luke happened to respond when those humans were\n\u003e available, and you didn't. I personally had to do the exact same thing\n\u003e the other day with one of my posts.\n\u003e\n\u003e Moderation is an unfortunate thing to need, but this list is read by\n\u003e literally hundreds of busy people, many of whome have had to unsubscribe\n\u003e at various points in the past due to a lack of moderation. I wish we had\n\u003e a better solution, but that's what we have. We're also not along in\n\u003e using fairly agressive moderation, for example the\n\u003e cryptography at metzdowd.com mailing list where Bitcoin was originally\n\u003e announced uses manual approval moderation on all messages as well;\n\u003e there's also an unmoderated offshoot of it, cryptography at randombit.net\n\u003e\n\u003e (and feel free to start an unmoderated version of bitcoin-dev!)\n\u003e\n\u003e --\n\u003e https://petertodd.org 'peter'[:-1]@petertodd.org\n\u003e 000000000000000008320874843f282f554aa2436290642fcfa81e5a01d78698\n\u003e\n-------------- next part --------------\nAn HTML attachment was scrubbed...\nURL: \u003chttp://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/attachments/20160202/9808fdc5/attachment.html\u003e",
"sig": "a4a8465bf77c23b9de537bfafb6fa154f41c0d84a1b1e98710a55a085040bcf6cab8076e402c8bee44705cd5f416af7e37c08d4e1ef3d9ef046cb9a5ab4e9e82"
}