📅 Original date posted:2014-09-27
📝 Original message:On 9/25/2014 7:37 PM, Aaron Voisine wrote:
> Of course you wouldn't want nodes to propagate alerts without
> independently verifying them
How would a node independently verify a double-spend alert, other than
by having access to an actual signed double-spend?
#4570 relays the first double-spend AS an alert. Running this branch on
mainnet, I have been keeping a live list of relayed double-spend
transactions at http://respends.thinlink.com
Tom Harding [ARCHIVE] /
npub1ms…pmwjy
2023-06-07 15:25:59
in reply to nevent1q…lnfq
Author Public Key
npub1msef5qkfwz4t7qacwxz775wgdtlytph78g2g2z903x90874u263sypmwjyPublished at
2023-06-07 15:25:59Event JSON
{
"id": "b92d40e751611d8895d48e9814fbf21b76a44b86ffd3c7db43ca58a4ab070177",
"pubkey": "dc329a02c970aabf03b87185ef51c86afe4586fe3a148508af898af3fabc56a3",
"created_at": 1686151559,
"kind": 1,
"tags": [
[
"e",
"4f9ac54bd6567a8c3e1bbdc8600514d9552b8a33dc3e70bf70216815782b2480",
"",
"root"
],
[
"e",
"004a882542784222451dee1e4118217aeaa3ac5c1bf5335c7831c2149a923dc8",
"",
"reply"
],
[
"p",
"dacd0f484b9bd5e69704fe6452dfeb000ac01ebc36cef17eb3e9ba9696e1301d"
]
],
"content": "📅 Original date posted:2014-09-27\n📝 Original message:On 9/25/2014 7:37 PM, Aaron Voisine wrote:\n\u003e Of course you wouldn't want nodes to propagate alerts without\n\u003e independently verifying them\nHow would a node independently verify a double-spend alert, other than \nby having access to an actual signed double-spend?\n\n#4570 relays the first double-spend AS an alert. Running this branch on \nmainnet, I have been keeping a live list of relayed double-spend \ntransactions at http://respends.thinlink.com",
"sig": "d42de0c930213f1950841fe7f8913bfef9c86fe63b5516e4d2136c0a5bb17556172065121fa8ff3542cf3b9c67125d444a2eef3d95f7d6a255c27b71c0f6eec0"
}