📅 Original date posted:2018-06-25
📝 Original message:Hi
> As was partially brought up by William, shouldn't we consider using
> bech32? It doesn't break on double-click and it is a dependency for
> native Segwit addresses anyway, so wallets might already support it or
> they will at some point. But we should probably run some numbers on this
> first, since bech32 will obviously be larger than base64.
I don’t think bech32 is a fit here.
Bech32 is a BCH where the error detecting properties are optimised for 1023 chars max and in the special case of the Bech32 BCH, error detection of 4 chars are guaranteed with a max length of 90 chars.
/jonas
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/attachments/20180625/88470c4c/attachment.html>;
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 833 bytes
Desc: Message signed with OpenPGP
URL: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/attachments/20180625/88470c4c/attachment.sig>;
Jonas Schnelli [ARCHIVE] /
npub1nf…3dtxs
2023-06-07 18:13:11
in reply to nevent1q…pdka
Author Public Key
npub1nfrrurat393mqymf3s26pujyn5vujlem3pzcukr5p9d4qpklngxq43dtxsPublished at
2023-06-07 18:13:11Event JSON
{
"id": "bbb9ac0a60ae4eaf32db5a819cc4f419779d7e54e23bb748d331f21c13e55638",
"pubkey": "9a463e0fab8963b013698c15a0f2449d19c97f3b88458e5874095b5006df9a0c",
"created_at": 1686161591,
"kind": 1,
"tags": [
[
"e",
"cde3c2f1af5ec4e3200e32c7fdbcba54b58741a9d65d38dd383e78325ee0ffcd",
"",
"root"
],
[
"e",
"e52a969c4bfd6ac40f889178ad58a0828e91fb374ad00a70622b133bd93f1727",
"",
"reply"
],
[
"p",
"08ae0bfd976351122067b648108fa6d210f06e035903bc8b5e4e5d5e0a0cb83a"
]
],
"content": "📅 Original date posted:2018-06-25\n📝 Original message:Hi\n\u003e As was partially brought up by William, shouldn't we consider using\n\u003e bech32? It doesn't break on double-click and it is a dependency for\n\u003e native Segwit addresses anyway, so wallets might already support it or\n\u003e they will at some point. But we should probably run some numbers on this\n\u003e first, since bech32 will obviously be larger than base64.\nI don’t think bech32 is a fit here.\nBech32 is a BCH where the error detecting properties are optimised for 1023 chars max and in the special case of the Bech32 BCH, error detection of 4 chars are guaranteed with a max length of 90 chars.\n\n/jonas\n-------------- next part --------------\nAn HTML attachment was scrubbed...\nURL: \u003chttp://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/attachments/20180625/88470c4c/attachment.html\u003e\n-------------- next part --------------\nA non-text attachment was scrubbed...\nName: signature.asc\nType: application/pgp-signature\nSize: 833 bytes\nDesc: Message signed with OpenPGP\nURL: \u003chttp://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/attachments/20180625/88470c4c/attachment.sig\u003e",
"sig": "f0b412b5e85fcc63569659ce8fd637a8b4d6dbb5f6bfe782a0205bf01c1a9480a9e2f6cb8cdb27339749c07a211905426d3adab86fb7ad9cf7d41ea0cac7d673"
}