📅 Original date posted:2015-08-17
📝 Original message:On 08/16/15 23:22, Andrew LeCody via bitcoin-dev wrote:
> Cam, your scenario makes no sense.
>
>> 1. Spoil the ballot. Have Bitcoin Core propagate the Bitcoin XT version
> string.
>> 2. Encourage all miners to false vote for the Bitcoin XT fork.
>
> This would obliterate any confidence in Bitcoin Core. I seriously doubt
> anyone would actually be ok with a pull request implementing this.
Bitcoin Core doesnt have to do this. It is rational if you have >25% of
hash power (or if you believe 25% of hash power is doing this) to do this.
If a 75% hardfork target is reached, and >25% of the hashpower doesnt
allow the hardfork, and the hardfork is strictly more permissive than
the original (ie it is essentially a reverse softfork - there are no
previously valid blocks which are not still valid), then the miners who
voted for the fork would be constantly generating blocks which are
soft-forked-out by the >25% and non-supporting miners.
I believe this was pointed out to the Bitcoin XT folks weeks ago, but
apparently did not sway the decision to use 75% and a (as far as I can
tell?) strictly more permissive hardfork.
Matt
Matt Corallo [ARCHIVE] /
npub1e4…jxmcu
2023-06-07 17:35:36
in reply to nevent1q…n0ap
Author Public Key
npub1e46n428mcyfwznl7nlsf6d3s7rhlwm9x3cmkuqzt3emmdpadmkaqqjxmcuSeen on
wss://relay.noswhere.comPublished at
2023-06-07 17:35:36Event JSON
{
"id": "bbfb4d618ab4e1e84fb2cb8a0febc76021e9b01ab855d5fe1ca37b1364f0eef6",
"pubkey": "cd753aa8fbc112e14ffe9fe09d3630f0eff76ca68e376e004b8e77b687adddba",
"created_at": 1686159336,
"kind": 1,
"tags": [
[
"e",
"c8deaa0aeee1e5d915e04ef7baf8b8074172a310b656820cd8767442ca514e56",
"",
"root"
],
[
"e",
"d580e8b4a2285b1cbdb5aec25ae3330ae0d6d20c038adf26d58bfb94b291a2cf",
"",
"reply"
],
[
"p",
"c632841665fccdabf021322b1d969539c9c1f829ceed38844fea24e8512962d7"
]
],
"content": "📅 Original date posted:2015-08-17\n📝 Original message:On 08/16/15 23:22, Andrew LeCody via bitcoin-dev wrote:\n\u003e Cam, your scenario makes no sense.\n\u003e \n\u003e\u003e 1. Spoil the ballot. Have Bitcoin Core propagate the Bitcoin XT version\n\u003e string.\n\u003e\u003e 2. Encourage all miners to false vote for the Bitcoin XT fork.\n\u003e \n\u003e This would obliterate any confidence in Bitcoin Core. I seriously doubt\n\u003e anyone would actually be ok with a pull request implementing this.\n\nBitcoin Core doesnt have to do this. It is rational if you have \u003e25% of\nhash power (or if you believe 25% of hash power is doing this) to do this.\nIf a 75% hardfork target is reached, and \u003e25% of the hashpower doesnt\nallow the hardfork, and the hardfork is strictly more permissive than\nthe original (ie it is essentially a reverse softfork - there are no\npreviously valid blocks which are not still valid), then the miners who\nvoted for the fork would be constantly generating blocks which are\nsoft-forked-out by the \u003e25% and non-supporting miners.\nI believe this was pointed out to the Bitcoin XT folks weeks ago, but\napparently did not sway the decision to use 75% and a (as far as I can\ntell?) strictly more permissive hardfork.\n\nMatt",
"sig": "1d0ef03ec895f3dcaf4b9d04bfc8baa901d3685947662d5b879ca69e9a3d76106d941ef4ef3cc90e7b551801e3a9566b8bef4730fee1b3e97202479649126866"
}