📅 Original date posted:2019-04-03
📝 Original message:On Wednesday 03 April 2019 15:39:29 Ethan Scruples via bitcoin-dev wrote:
> If we can get mandatory UTXO commitments soft forked into Bitcoin, we get
> the advantage of a non-growing IBD,
No, we don't. This is exactly the danger. UTXO snapshots are NOT an
alternative to a real IBD. There are HUGE security implications for this.
Frankly, the danger that someone would do such a thing is itself a good
reason not to ever add UTXO commitments.
Luke
Luke Dashjr [ARCHIVE] /
npub1tf…rfq0n
2023-06-07 18:17:25
in reply to nevent1q…hr5h
Author Public Key
npub1tfk373zg9dnmtvxnpnq7s2dkdgj37rwfj3yrwld7830qltmv8qps8rfq0nPublished at
2023-06-07 18:17:25Event JSON
{
"id": "bba922f4581d61d24efbb26af12878292e2bfe466ce088e2a496a3ef947499c9",
"pubkey": "5a6d1f44482b67b5b0d30cc1e829b66a251f0dc99448377dbe3c5e0faf6c3803",
"created_at": 1686161845,
"kind": 1,
"tags": [
[
"e",
"7fe043d4917b4de5bb05b8bc29d3ef7d97da6136e369b891cad658d07735d7a1",
"",
"root"
],
[
"e",
"54ced7049ae35566549fe8006f5054a30cd4d9ae54024d8a807483cf5ac857ab",
"",
"reply"
],
[
"p",
"a384795310cea1937dda4d01ee8f14ca734b9a7ab60c62114a5656706e15e47f"
]
],
"content": "📅 Original date posted:2019-04-03\n📝 Original message:On Wednesday 03 April 2019 15:39:29 Ethan Scruples via bitcoin-dev wrote:\n\u003e If we can get mandatory UTXO commitments soft forked into Bitcoin, we get\n\u003e the advantage of a non-growing IBD,\n\nNo, we don't. This is exactly the danger. UTXO snapshots are NOT an \nalternative to a real IBD. There are HUGE security implications for this. \nFrankly, the danger that someone would do such a thing is itself a good \nreason not to ever add UTXO commitments.\n\nLuke",
"sig": "b36d26b8bc3df545245eb5875d1b9dd7f6e64e72253497d0c4097fe25d8e0081ac2c69f733c74217a9449a0acff97ef7f250375a728d0874ea6769c9e1437e85"
}