Idle Thought: Were your foot as cancerous as the present U.S. Supreme Court would you not treat it? Even remove it need be?
Why should SCOTUS be any different?
Ignoring SCOTUS decisions would be amputation of last resort. How about discounting the votes of both Thomas and Roberts on every decision?
So a 6-3 vote becomes a 4-3 vote. In that case nothing would change, but that would not always be the case.
Actually, I prefer Wyden's reform bill. But that's not quite immediate enough.
Bill Lamb /
npub14k…tn56c
2024-09-28 16:16:11
Author Public Key
npub14kf5a5yl0ym3pwdk30dj3s4l5gdw6vm8dex44wztq8kmna9lvzyqstn56cPublished at
2024-09-28 16:16:11Event JSON
{
"id": "b48668813ae33999ccb7869938f12eb10cc7c6243c8aa2cc3d799e6a2cbc3812",
"pubkey": "ad934ed09f793710b9b68bdb28c2bfa21aed33676e4d5ab84b01edb9f4bf6088",
"created_at": 1727540171,
"kind": 1,
"tags": [
[
"proxy",
"https://newsie.social/users/zachvat/statuses/113216072674742543",
"activitypub"
]
],
"content": "Idle Thought: Were your foot as cancerous as the present U.S. Supreme Court would you not treat it? Even remove it need be?\n\nWhy should SCOTUS be any different?\n\nIgnoring SCOTUS decisions would be amputation of last resort. How about discounting the votes of both Thomas and Roberts on every decision?\n\nSo a 6-3 vote becomes a 4-3 vote. In that case nothing would change, but that would not always be the case.\n\nActually, I prefer Wyden's reform bill. But that's not quite immediate enough.",
"sig": "cd0de19462c291d5981fa8464c7277398d1db7d65d91256ce0baf00353e30ecc874bebe5f2a04a9ed611db3994689b1411c902c92836905e56ff7c81b4529d3d"
}