📅 Original date posted:2015-10-05
📝 Original message:On Mon, Oct 5, 2015 at 9:08 PM, Tom Zander via bitcoin-dev
<bitcoin-dev at lists.linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
> On Monday 5. October 2015 20.56.34 Gregory Maxwell wrote:
>> (In this case, I don't even believe we have any regulator
>> contributors that disagree).
>
> Regular contributor?
>
> Please explain how for a fork in the protocol should you only listen to
> regular Bitcoin Core contributors?
I'm providing some perspective and scope-- referencing again your
comment about following actions-- what element of the many dozens of
responses suggests to you that _anyone_ is not being listened to?
While I'm sure its not intended; your selective editing ends up
butchering the meaning---- I pointed out that there have been
disputes, even ones involving regular contributors (and, implicitly,
that I'm not lying by omission in not mentioning that the dispute was
a joke or from someone well known to attack Bitcoin) or-- in other
words, evidence that the disagreement was not less meaningful than
what you're talking about here. That's all, sorry I was unclear again.
Did you see in my message that I invited you to take a look for
examples-- I think they're easily found and you would find it
informative. I really recommend spending some time looking.
Gregory Maxwell [ARCHIVE] /
npub1f2…crwet
2023-06-07 17:42:48
in reply to nevent1q…nk22
Author Public Key
npub1f2nvlx49er5c7sqa43src6ssyp6snd4qwvtkwm5avc2l84cs84esecrwetPublished at
2023-06-07 17:42:48Event JSON
{
"id": "b4c8572e01998f8207f7c988da462bd265be3dfe01c042768d410eff878a34be",
"pubkey": "4aa6cf9aa5c8e98f401dac603c6a10207509b6a07317676e9d6615f3d7103d73",
"created_at": 1686159768,
"kind": 1,
"tags": [
[
"e",
"8b171b0a181c0ea41f6054eb15f1f19559c90fd9ce9e5f5fc159720aea23cfd9",
"",
"root"
],
[
"e",
"6df0f19ac323b72323af92b0682277267fe2263a41b2011c02c94b5f751a6db7",
"",
"reply"
],
[
"p",
"1b29d94ee81e1ee0479f1db4bc4ac887407bd470a0d7060e76f8ab27fdd57e50"
]
],
"content": "📅 Original date posted:2015-10-05\n📝 Original message:On Mon, Oct 5, 2015 at 9:08 PM, Tom Zander via bitcoin-dev\n\u003cbitcoin-dev at lists.linuxfoundation.org\u003e wrote:\n\u003e On Monday 5. October 2015 20.56.34 Gregory Maxwell wrote:\n\u003e\u003e (In this case, I don't even believe we have any regulator\n\u003e\u003e contributors that disagree).\n\u003e\n\u003e Regular contributor?\n\u003e\n\u003e Please explain how for a fork in the protocol should you only listen to\n\u003e regular Bitcoin Core contributors?\n\nI'm providing some perspective and scope-- referencing again your\ncomment about following actions-- what element of the many dozens of\nresponses suggests to you that _anyone_ is not being listened to?\n\nWhile I'm sure its not intended; your selective editing ends up\nbutchering the meaning---- I pointed out that there have been\ndisputes, even ones involving regular contributors (and, implicitly,\nthat I'm not lying by omission in not mentioning that the dispute was\na joke or from someone well known to attack Bitcoin) or-- in other\nwords, evidence that the disagreement was not less meaningful than\nwhat you're talking about here. That's all, sorry I was unclear again.\n\nDid you see in my message that I invited you to take a look for\nexamples-- I think they're easily found and you would find it\ninformative. I really recommend spending some time looking.",
"sig": "f044c774b489cba5ba3e671a68ace2563db27a7f5be2bd7afb327c5c258ecfb4451707b513a01e5600a0661c7d33d9bbb4dc82e8cb253144be02fcab0c7916db"
}