Cian O’Donnell on Nostr: Is biophysical modelling in neuroscience dead? Note I do this all the time. Colleague ...
Is biophysical modelling in neuroscience dead?
Note I do this all the time. Colleague suggested that however yes, it is dead, mainly due to the findings of Eve Marder et al: that neurons properties are massively degenerate. So no point in modelling various ion channel dynamics in detail.
I have to admit this keeps me awake at night wondering if I should pack it all in and just boot up a convolutional neural network, like the rest of computational neuroscientists seem to be doing these days.
Published at
2023-09-06 13:44:09Event JSON
{
"id": "bcabeaed61e352ab2ae9b3f8042c651f0ede837b88c68324ad21c721da3f7352",
"pubkey": "71d38b07e4b336654573c9d1543ef2fe067ef2e2ca348e6db0effd140e3f2a64",
"created_at": 1694007849,
"kind": 1,
"tags": [
[
"proxy",
"https://mstdn.science/users/cian/statuses/111018498442350634",
"activitypub"
]
],
"content": "Is biophysical modelling in neuroscience dead?\n\nNote I do this all the time. Colleague suggested that however yes, it is dead, mainly due to the findings of Eve Marder et al: that neurons properties are massively degenerate. So no point in modelling various ion channel dynamics in detail.\n\nI have to admit this keeps me awake at night wondering if I should pack it all in and just boot up a convolutional neural network, like the rest of computational neuroscientists seem to be doing these days.",
"sig": "926b89609513c0390b53da85b6014172edf2ba3db2ade9d60593b8358b66c8091635eb35ec30d84d4d4516c943fd69a8db2834e00f46ffdb8b07bdc9b028a4b8"
}