š
Original date posted:2014-06-16
š Original message:True, enough philosophy. Once this BIP will be finalized - we will it's
schedule implementation in XBTerminal. This is a solution to the problem we
have, probably best one we have to date, so we will use it.
2014-06-16 19:09 GMT+01:00 Mike Hearn <mike at plan99.net>:
> I think many of us feel it'd be better if this kind of thing were not
> needed at all, however, the best way to ensure it doesn't end up being used
> is to write code, not to try and block alternative approaches. If Bitcoin
> is robust the market should sort it out. If it's robust for some
> transactions and not others, that makes for a fun project for a future
> generation of hackers to sort out.
>
> OK, enough philosophy - let's try and keep this thread just for discussion
> of the BIP itself from now on. If you'd like to continue debating the
> Future of Bitcoin please change the subject line and break it out into a
> new thread.
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/attachments/20140616/d67b537a/attachment.html>;
Alex Kotenko [ARCHIVE] /
npub14jā¦h00t4
2023-06-07 15:22:49
in reply to nevent1qā¦44fk
Author Public Key
npub14jv7tj33yt72yk8mljmvkck3p4xm5s3mxfpj289up38qqsn9dhkqeh00t4Published at
2023-06-07 15:22:49Event JSON
{
"id": "b6f40ed272385df6c2590db76cf920523cbb8be67d62903e74048a4e6fc672cc",
"pubkey": "ac99e5ca3122fca258fbfcb6cb62d10d4dba423b3243251cbc0c4e0042656dec",
"created_at": 1686151369,
"kind": 1,
"tags": [
[
"e",
"ed0eede28e160c2ef8ddd5af1ee3069fdb0eb5f4c939c1c09a1a5f338c30c628",
"",
"root"
],
[
"e",
"2b2651edd47cb6de78d976cedbe029f7406d23d5d9801d17132f471693600a98",
"",
"reply"
],
[
"p",
"dce3e74d4fb3751e07a976b4d9e0d8c9189e3758c92528fa0b2d7a507e701bb2"
]
],
"content": "š
Original date posted:2014-06-16\nš Original message:True, enough philosophy. Once this BIP will be finalized - we will it's\nschedule implementation in XBTerminal. This is a solution to the problem we\nhave, probably best one we have to date, so we will use it.\n\n\n2014-06-16 19:09 GMT+01:00 Mike Hearn \u003cmike at plan99.net\u003e:\n\n\u003e I think many of us feel it'd be better if this kind of thing were not\n\u003e needed at all, however, the best way to ensure it doesn't end up being used\n\u003e is to write code, not to try and block alternative approaches. If Bitcoin\n\u003e is robust the market should sort it out. If it's robust for some\n\u003e transactions and not others, that makes for a fun project for a future\n\u003e generation of hackers to sort out.\n\u003e\n\u003e OK, enough philosophy - let's try and keep this thread just for discussion\n\u003e of the BIP itself from now on. If you'd like to continue debating the\n\u003e Future of Bitcoin please change the subject line and break it out into a\n\u003e new thread.\n\u003e\n-------------- next part --------------\nAn HTML attachment was scrubbed...\nURL: \u003chttp://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/attachments/20140616/d67b537a/attachment.html\u003e",
"sig": "4c59a87767d5190302ea93dc6170050f7988878b00ed25e25f25c7caa0c38d0e776d3537fa567364979dc548de3b0e406684ce311ec95e5619371a783c089a2d"
}