📅 Original date posted:2015-08-23
📝 Original message:On Mon, Aug 24, 2015 at 1:41 AM, Tom Harding via bitcoin-dev
<bitcoin-dev at lists.linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
> On 8/21/2015 5:01 PM, Peter Todd wrote:
>>
>>> I checked the scenario where only the radio is on, and found the car
>>> does not crash.
>> Incidentally, what's your acceptable revenue difference between a small
>> (1% hashing power) and large (%30 hashing power) miner, all else being
>> equal? (remember that we shouldn't preclude variance reduction
>> techniques such as p2pool and pooled-solo mode)
>>
>> Equally, what kind of attacks on miners do you think we need to be able to
>> resist? E.g. DoS attacks, hacking, etc.
>>
>
> None of this is in the scope of Pieter's simulation.
>
> If you think that casts doubt on my conclusions, then it casts doubt on
> his original conclusions as well.
As far as I know, "his conclusions" were that there was an effect,
while suspending judgement on whether that effect was high enough to
be important for a given size or not.
Jorge Timón [ARCHIVE] /
npub1fx…cl2d8
2023-06-07 17:36:24
in reply to nevent1q…a9yq
Author Public Key
npub1fx98zxt3lzspjs5f4msr0fxysx5euucm29ghysryju7vpc9j0jzqtcl2d8Published at
2023-06-07 17:36:24Event JSON
{
"id": "bc7c2b222dead8903c5720cf408e395fa5f58ce629898f1db819fd7823188578",
"pubkey": "498a711971f8a0194289aee037a4c481a99e731b5151724064973cc0e0b27c84",
"created_at": 1686159384,
"kind": 1,
"tags": [
[
"e",
"7ed22d6d4b773f63b7d7a74d45f8a3ef2ee47a84961e7f380d598c1822de0b82",
"",
"root"
],
[
"e",
"ddab5797962d6877bfb4fa75966adc48ac927df9cb60f28283665d8769e2722c",
"",
"reply"
],
[
"p",
"dc329a02c970aabf03b87185ef51c86afe4586fe3a148508af898af3fabc56a3"
]
],
"content": "📅 Original date posted:2015-08-23\n📝 Original message:On Mon, Aug 24, 2015 at 1:41 AM, Tom Harding via bitcoin-dev\n\u003cbitcoin-dev at lists.linuxfoundation.org\u003e wrote:\n\u003e On 8/21/2015 5:01 PM, Peter Todd wrote:\n\u003e\u003e\n\u003e\u003e\u003e I checked the scenario where only the radio is on, and found the car\n\u003e\u003e\u003e does not crash.\n\u003e\u003e Incidentally, what's your acceptable revenue difference between a small\n\u003e\u003e (1% hashing power) and large (%30 hashing power) miner, all else being\n\u003e\u003e equal? (remember that we shouldn't preclude variance reduction\n\u003e\u003e techniques such as p2pool and pooled-solo mode)\n\u003e\u003e\n\u003e\u003e Equally, what kind of attacks on miners do you think we need to be able to\n\u003e\u003e resist? E.g. DoS attacks, hacking, etc.\n\u003e\u003e\n\u003e\n\u003e None of this is in the scope of Pieter's simulation.\n\u003e\n\u003e If you think that casts doubt on my conclusions, then it casts doubt on\n\u003e his original conclusions as well.\n\nAs far as I know, \"his conclusions\" were that there was an effect,\nwhile suspending judgement on whether that effect was high enough to\nbe important for a given size or not.",
"sig": "0fc7cf8525f3030b4e498cb03d47b414d9a838c9c629efb9920f41292f072f4c73621a312cd98c245398fcb08a9e66f3cab7093b8efe359719c9875faa82df9e"
}