📅 Original date posted:2015-02-13
📝 Original message:>
> > history. Lots of miners have dropped out due to hardware obsolescence,
> yet
> > massive double spending hasn't happened.
>
> How many thousands of BTC must be stolen by miners before you'd agree
> that it has, in fact, happened?
> (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=321630.0)
>
Hmm. I think this is a disagreement over the term massive. I was meaning we
don't see double spending like we see carding fraud in the traditional
online payments world. We can talk about Finney attacks by linking to
specific discussions of specific events, because they are very rare, which
is why merchants generally ignore the possibility. I didn't mean the
numeric value of lost coins added up so far.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/attachments/20150213/9189abb3/attachment.html>;
Mike Hearn [ARCHIVE] /
npub17t…4qgyd
2023-06-07 15:30:19
in reply to nevent1q…ne83
Author Public Key
npub17ty4mumkv43w8wtt0xsz2jypck0gvw0j8xrcg6tpea25z2nh7meqf4qgydPublished at
2023-06-07 15:30:19Event JSON
{
"id": "bc1eb841e6ca82130a4cedf68ffcf246684e9ca4b6bd6afc2255850309feca2c",
"pubkey": "f2c95df3766562e3b96b79a0254881c59e8639f23987846961cf55412a77f6f2",
"created_at": 1686151819,
"kind": 1,
"tags": [
[
"e",
"ba772dbf5c965827fc712af37e2abb78447348cb2e1023b6358796cc65e7b8fb",
"",
"root"
],
[
"e",
"34ea8e4c9ede2c47b5c01ecc8e2b9fc9bd014fa9cbc708aee7a9c77594ab2845",
"",
"reply"
],
[
"p",
"daa2fc676a25e3b5b45644540bcbd1e1168b111427cd0e3cf19c56194fb231aa"
]
],
"content": "📅 Original date posted:2015-02-13\n📝 Original message:\u003e\n\u003e \u003e history. Lots of miners have dropped out due to hardware obsolescence,\n\u003e yet\n\u003e \u003e massive double spending hasn't happened.\n\u003e\n\u003e How many thousands of BTC must be stolen by miners before you'd agree\n\u003e that it has, in fact, happened?\n\u003e (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=321630.0)\n\u003e\n\nHmm. I think this is a disagreement over the term massive. I was meaning we\ndon't see double spending like we see carding fraud in the traditional\nonline payments world. We can talk about Finney attacks by linking to\nspecific discussions of specific events, because they are very rare, which\nis why merchants generally ignore the possibility. I didn't mean the\nnumeric value of lost coins added up so far.\n-------------- next part --------------\nAn HTML attachment was scrubbed...\nURL: \u003chttp://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/attachments/20150213/9189abb3/attachment.html\u003e",
"sig": "dd426ee0b63da521e5287fd7453b4e70abb98cfd20b871c171f65b58e79863e7103e904eb1b11a550ce2fb1498225ac8bde6a2157f8951345205eb6ea2427dae"
}