📅 Original date posted:2014-01-17
📝 Original message:On 01/16/2014 01:28 PM, Peter Todd wrote:
> I'm very against the name "reusable addresses" and strongly belive we
> should stick with the name stealth addresses.
I agree wholeheartedly against using "reusable address". I personally
am fine with "stealth address", but can see where there might be a
negative connotation.
Might I suggest "master address", which is neutral in connotation, but
indicates both that it is fixed and that payment addresses are generated
as needed from it.
But please, no "reusable address."
--
Johnathan Corgan, Corgan Labs
SDR Training and Development Services
http://corganlabs.com
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: johnathan.vcf
Type: text/x-vcard
Size: 334 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/attachments/20140116/14d333f0/attachment.vcf>;
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 230 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/attachments/20140116/14d333f0/attachment.sig>;
Johnathan Corgan [ARCHIVE] /
npub1j6…jm42m
2023-06-07 15:11:45
in reply to nevent1q…rwy0
Author Public Key
npub1j66aek8wm7jq8vaffs2l8w43evyywd4q7tcnqyge6xqezz0vcpks7jm42mPublished at
2023-06-07 15:11:45Event JSON
{
"id": "b2cd772ca5497311405720e9075256abd86043e55f7e8cc8dfc2426cb3611151",
"pubkey": "96b5dcd8eedfa403b3a94c15f3bab1cb084736a0f2f1301119d1819109ecc06d",
"created_at": 1686150705,
"kind": 1,
"tags": [
[
"e",
"6b79d8c7bec3dc6952db91cc68d0510d9897c37dcf58a24d8e2f4288fe42525c",
"",
"root"
],
[
"e",
"0ae796eef7f997e0721c1e1d722f5becb1120ffda9247384d0d531d52de8db53",
"",
"reply"
],
[
"p",
"daa2fc676a25e3b5b45644540bcbd1e1168b111427cd0e3cf19c56194fb231aa"
]
],
"content": "📅 Original date posted:2014-01-17\n📝 Original message:On 01/16/2014 01:28 PM, Peter Todd wrote:\n\n\u003e I'm very against the name \"reusable addresses\" and strongly belive we\n\u003e should stick with the name stealth addresses.\n\nI agree wholeheartedly against using \"reusable address\". I personally\nam fine with \"stealth address\", but can see where there might be a\nnegative connotation.\n\nMight I suggest \"master address\", which is neutral in connotation, but\nindicates both that it is fixed and that payment addresses are generated\nas needed from it.\n\nBut please, no \"reusable address.\"\n\n-- \nJohnathan Corgan, Corgan Labs\nSDR Training and Development Services\nhttp://corganlabs.com\n-------------- next part --------------\nA non-text attachment was scrubbed...\nName: johnathan.vcf\nType: text/x-vcard\nSize: 334 bytes\nDesc: not available\nURL: \u003chttp://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/attachments/20140116/14d333f0/attachment.vcf\u003e\n-------------- next part --------------\nA non-text attachment was scrubbed...\nName: signature.asc\nType: application/pgp-signature\nSize: 230 bytes\nDesc: OpenPGP digital signature\nURL: \u003chttp://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/attachments/20140116/14d333f0/attachment.sig\u003e",
"sig": "c3b5b4f50cb193aee1d64e993779cb46e65f57580c5bff415f932d618551324aae0cb0559a891c9fc5bfbf723ef52efb3b4762caa7dbe3159968eb878ef79a01"
}