📅 Original date posted:2015-02-03
📝 Original message:> One way to do that is to just - right now - add a patch to 0.10 to
> make those non-standard. This requires another validation flag, with a
> bunch of switching logic.
>
> The much simpler alternative is just adding this to BIP66's DERSIG
> right now, which is a one-line change that's obviously softforking. Is
> anyone opposed to doing so at this stage?
Not opposed, but is kind of late for 0.10, I had hoped to tag rc4 today.
Wladimir
Wladimir [ARCHIVE] /
npub1xq…ymc2p
2023-06-07 15:29:29
in reply to nevent1q…hawp
Author Public Key
npub1xqshkqv2g7uea4xzqwvmgjcz7u8vfavw6aazs999v0azsv3w7u3qpymc2pSeen on
wss://relay.nostr.bandPublished at
2023-06-07 15:29:29Event JSON
{
"id": "bd2dc14bbcadd17f20c2d51e8d8f92f62d011e6992e6e22323e495148cb6b7b1",
"pubkey": "30217b018a47b99ed4c20399b44b02f70ec4f58ed77a2814a563fa28322ef722",
"created_at": 1686151769,
"kind": 1,
"tags": [
[
"e",
"05e51c029a722929b5fbec075843e79ec67eca31eb13392b50cc99ca6b8aaa84",
"",
"root"
],
[
"e",
"35c8b7f1278640d7faa4589ef51cd2bf1eb7bfa6b55828478211fc5f9d2484e8",
"",
"reply"
],
[
"p",
"4aa6cf9aa5c8e98f401dac603c6a10207509b6a07317676e9d6615f3d7103d73"
]
],
"content": "📅 Original date posted:2015-02-03\n📝 Original message:\u003e One way to do that is to just - right now - add a patch to 0.10 to\n\u003e make those non-standard. This requires another validation flag, with a\n\u003e bunch of switching logic.\n\u003e\n\u003e The much simpler alternative is just adding this to BIP66's DERSIG\n\u003e right now, which is a one-line change that's obviously softforking. Is\n\u003e anyone opposed to doing so at this stage?\n\nNot opposed, but is kind of late for 0.10, I had hoped to tag rc4 today.\n\nWladimir",
"sig": "fcfbd08a1eea864eeb01c29bc47785e96cd18a6fdb1cab74fc1286be721fad27714cc365733c2e23d83250f5da28998e9083942cb154d5fcda5df411a1431809"
}