📅 Original date posted:2012-07-27
📝 Original message:> I now have an 1.8 ghz p3 celeron (128k cache) which should be
> substantially slower than your machine, running vintage 2.6.20 linux.
> Unfortunately I forgot to turn on timestamp logging so I don't know
> how long it took to sync the chain, but it was less than two days as
> that was the span between when I checked on it. It's staying current
Well, are you running bitcoin on, say, an FS with sha256 integrity
trees for all bits and AES-128-XTS/CBC disk encryption?
If not, we're not comparing the same apples, let alone the same OS.
> Again, I encourage you to investigate your software configuration.
Someone suggested I investigate turning off the above features.
Since I'd find their loss undesirable [1], and there's not much to be
tuned there anyways, I've given up and am investigating what more
GHz and cores will do.
[1] Keeping data both intact and private is a good thing. Does your
checkbook deserve any less?
grarpamp [ARCHIVE] /
npub1rj…vs23t
2023-06-07 10:25:20
in reply to nevent1q…atlf
Author Public Key
npub1rjzq78n467z9ugxvfq6cyxdk8n3rtn8h92yjnrtene4a52g847rsgvs23tPublished at
2023-06-07 10:25:20Event JSON
{
"id": "ba32367d2963864b5d4583b77a4be2d34a1dbb38e571a559f02ef44b1d11f56b",
"pubkey": "1c840f1e75d7845e20cc48358219b63ce235ccf72a89298d799e6bda2907af87",
"created_at": 1686133520,
"kind": 1,
"tags": [
[
"e",
"63aed588f060c9675f9ddd34399756623e96cc693cda2679b108affeaacc7675",
"",
"root"
],
[
"e",
"06115bf497e07a545aed3f6fef82e6c42f609caec7c717e8a6483234d97eb3d7",
"",
"reply"
],
[
"p",
"4aa6cf9aa5c8e98f401dac603c6a10207509b6a07317676e9d6615f3d7103d73"
]
],
"content": "📅 Original date posted:2012-07-27\n📝 Original message:\u003e I now have an 1.8 ghz p3 celeron (128k cache) which should be\n\u003e substantially slower than your machine, running vintage 2.6.20 linux.\n\u003e Unfortunately I forgot to turn on timestamp logging so I don't know\n\u003e how long it took to sync the chain, but it was less than two days as\n\u003e that was the span between when I checked on it. It's staying current\n\nWell, are you running bitcoin on, say, an FS with sha256 integrity\ntrees for all bits and AES-128-XTS/CBC disk encryption?\nIf not, we're not comparing the same apples, let alone the same OS.\n\n\u003e Again, I encourage you to investigate your software configuration.\n\nSomeone suggested I investigate turning off the above features.\nSince I'd find their loss undesirable [1], and there's not much to be\ntuned there anyways, I've given up and am investigating what more\nGHz and cores will do.\n\n[1] Keeping data both intact and private is a good thing. Does your\ncheckbook deserve any less?",
"sig": "008adbf3a64b77ae9464e898483d79045fcef3e342d81b6422a87900f977e7c156407c7a0de4f2d8ce95ccbf1272aa6477d8df845c67672621412d8ff9a56410"
}