đź“… Original date posted:2012-02-03
đź“ť Original message:Hi Aidan,
Thanks, and the number is still 140700 - do we have a policy / logic on adding new checkpoints ? It seems to me that the number could easily be bumped to 160000 by now ?
Cheers,
Michael
On 03/02/2012, at 10:52, Aidan Thornton wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 3, 2012 at 9:22 AM, Michael Grønager <gronager at ceptacle.com> wrote:
>> Hi Gavin, others?
>>
>> I am trying to redo the performance test of the libcoin client against the 0.5.2 Satoshi client, that I have learned also have received quite some improvements in speed since 0.4.0 (e.g. from not verifying signatures on early blocks).
>>
>> However, I cannot find any tag with v0.5.2 in github:
>> https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/tags
>
> I think that tag's in
> https://gitorious.org/+bitcoin-stable-developers/bitcoin/bitcoind-stable
> - a certain amount of developer politics seems to be involved, and
> v0.5.2 may not have been pushed to the official github repository.
Michael Gronager, PhD
Director, Ceptacle
Jens Juels Gade 33
2100 Copenhagen E
Mobile: +45 31 45 14 01
E-mail: gronager at ceptacle.com
Web: http://www.ceptacle.com/
Michael Grønager [ARCHIVE] /
npub15f…xlq6h
2023-06-07 03:05:57
in reply to nevent1q…kuh7
Author Public Key
npub15fmnxm546tg2sv0l7elusrvqsgezdzdg3m0flpml5fr2qf3f5slskxlq6hPublished at
2023-06-07 03:05:57Event JSON
{
"id": "ba3d49abf5e907781e109f496d3186cb74af1135283f02f58892d29127aafe4f",
"pubkey": "a277336e95d2d0a831fff67fc80d8082322689a88ede9f877fa246a02629a43f",
"created_at": 1686107157,
"kind": 1,
"tags": [
[
"e",
"a4fc5738f88fe7f413af71eb5fdb524d1dcda3318d35f3c74ed10ba0bf18619c",
"",
"root"
],
[
"e",
"7ea3d898a0811c8762dad2a3eaa9320b72323163b7c9830fe20f680d7c2fccc4",
"",
"reply"
],
[
"p",
"38fb9fcb632ad32c4bd3c3008b319ead7b53af5f0d8af3095417d8587fba132a"
]
],
"content": "📅 Original date posted:2012-02-03\n📝 Original message:Hi Aidan,\n\nThanks, and the number is still 140700 - do we have a policy / logic on adding new checkpoints ? It seems to me that the number could easily be bumped to 160000 by now ?\n\nCheers,\n\nMichael\n \nOn 03/02/2012, at 10:52, Aidan Thornton wrote:\n\n\u003e On Fri, Feb 3, 2012 at 9:22 AM, Michael Grønager \u003cgronager at ceptacle.com\u003e wrote:\n\u003e\u003e Hi Gavin, others?\n\u003e\u003e \n\u003e\u003e I am trying to redo the performance test of the libcoin client against the 0.5.2 Satoshi client, that I have learned also have received quite some improvements in speed since 0.4.0 (e.g. from not verifying signatures on early blocks).\n\u003e\u003e \n\u003e\u003e However, I cannot find any tag with v0.5.2 in github:\n\u003e\u003e https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/tags\n\u003e \n\u003e I think that tag's in\n\u003e https://gitorious.org/+bitcoin-stable-developers/bitcoin/bitcoind-stable\n\u003e - a certain amount of developer politics seems to be involved, and\n\u003e v0.5.2 may not have been pushed to the official github repository.\n\nMichael Gronager, PhD\nDirector, Ceptacle\nJens Juels Gade 33\n2100 Copenhagen E\nMobile: +45 31 45 14 01\nE-mail: gronager at ceptacle.com\nWeb: http://www.ceptacle.com/",
"sig": "f402faafedf5e70af99bff54af2c26f440589e15b9f4faadd7965e5d1d2d295faf9cb3b172c513c1325a1430fd2ddb9bb97111423bfe8766f3fa42e10e09f517"
}