📅 Original date posted:2017-09-18
📝 Original message:Hi Dan.
What might be better aim is to have built in wipeout protection? In
softfork scenario this would protect a majority threatening a minority
with a wipeout if they do not opt in to some soft-fork consensus
change.
This could be partly done done by having automoated consensus critical
checkpoints, for example at 100 blocks deep. Maybe there are better
ways?
This would in effect turn softforks into hardforks.
Regards,
Daniel Wilczynski
Daniel Wilczynski [ARCHIVE] /
npub1qz…d0wna
2023-06-07 18:06:03
in reply to nevent1q…uv7p
Author Public Key
npub1qzmxrvl6kzt7jlqaelrqlj65swrxpyj5hmryy6netnsk4hrae8vqkd0wnaSeen on
wss://relay.nostr.bandPublished at
2023-06-07 18:06:03Event JSON
{
"id": "bab09b4dd3b8db18eafb9cf88365a64de1b13a7171b9f0ed56d3f9901652e9c3",
"pubkey": "00b661b3fab097e97c1dcfc60fcb548386609254bec6426a795ce16adc7dc9d8",
"created_at": 1686161163,
"kind": 1,
"tags": [
[
"e",
"91d6ec02934746fcbd43013df1b7508b93012bf45b887171ea0d0bbaa6dee098",
"",
"root"
],
[
"e",
"c25201c5bcf07605f74eeb27b49e869dff612644f886a9fbf6594b7a7073d987",
"",
"reply"
],
[
"p",
"bee276d1ae3341411bf36280d4da29fe701581dff23dcd2a5d7ac65535f7d8f9"
]
],
"content": "📅 Original date posted:2017-09-18\n📝 Original message:Hi Dan.\n\nWhat might be better aim is to have built in wipeout protection? In\nsoftfork scenario this would protect a majority threatening a minority\nwith a wipeout if they do not opt in to some soft-fork consensus\nchange.\n\n\nThis could be partly done done by having automoated consensus critical\ncheckpoints, for example at 100 blocks deep. Maybe there are better\nways?\n\n\nThis would in effect turn softforks into hardforks.\n\n\n\n\nRegards,\n\n\nDaniel Wilczynski",
"sig": "116a162fe68409fd86bcc155dfdf0a4b94ec0a585359a47f1c16a48666f9aabf9ce091d7ad0e34b2e3a88972dc318253a83dbbe3a3391b664b1b33eb7e8215b9"
}