Fabio Manganiello on Nostr: nprofile1q…u665q we can see ethnic distinctions in patterns in DNA Define “ethnic ...

nprofile1qy2hwumn8ghj7un9d3shjtnddaehgu3wwp6kyqpqethhqukzyn3cng30wvjr03vl6hr3a34kddpqjhncmcvvhr64lc8szu665q (nprofile…665q)

we can see ethnic distinctions in patterns in DNA

Define “ethnic distinction”. Because most of the biologists today seem to agree that modern-day Europeans are a mish-mash of Yamnaya DNA from the Asian steppes (sources [but I’m literally just scratching the surface here]: link 1, link 2), African, with most of the contributions coming from the original migrations of homo sapiens out of African, and many coming from trans-Saharian migrations that happened long before today’s boats in the Mediterranean (link 1, but it’s again barely scratching the surface), plus a local substratum that existed even before the indo-european migration flows.

Multiple groups cannot co-exist.

America for most of the 20th century, the Roman and Greek empires, the Mediterranean basin until the fall of the Bronze age, or even the Netherlands today, sensibly disagree.

If you have a clear genetic origin, repatriate that group there.

As a corollary of the above: there’s no such thing as a “clear genetic origin”. Your thoughts literally contraddict all the statistical evidence collected in biology in the past three decades. We’re all genetic puzzles, even looking at very short horizons (in biology terms) like the past 5000 years.

Because those who aren’t genetic puzzles don’t have a sufficiently diverse genetic pool, are more likely to be vulnerable to disease or Habsburg jaws, and are simply statistically less likely to reproduce.

Wanting to put everyone who looks in a certain way or speaks a certain language within a well defined fence is what’s truly against nature.