Event JSON
{
"id": "b560c99d246ead616c679c2653c0fe44ddb7936f466f664c172f6e555a54f29f",
"pubkey": "8602004de0642672d088db795b9f4245bebe2a7bd11002568380ac88e935f0b6",
"created_at": 1682620261,
"kind": 1,
"tags": [
[
"t",
"iamdb"
],
[
"t",
"rights"
],
[
"t",
"renters"
],
[
"t",
"house"
],
[
"t",
"Florida"
],
[
"t",
"landlord"
],
[
"t",
"Tenant"
],
[
"t",
"law"
],
[
"mostr",
"https://mstdn.social/users/IAmDannyBoling/statuses/110272201430300549"
]
],
"content": "\"Renters would be bound by the state’s #law governing the #tenant-#landlord relationship\" called Chapter 83, which is \"designed to benefit the landlord, period,” according to Rep. Anna Eskamani, D-Orlando. \n\nOf course it would. They don't give a shit about renters. 🤬 \n\nhttps://www.tampabay.com/news/florida-politics/2023/04/26/florida-legislature-tenants-landlords-rents/ \n#Florida #House moves to eliminate local #renters' #rights ordinances | Tampa Bay Times \n\n#IAmDB",
"sig": "b6341ab4fea9c6924292c2b0457186dd1635fb007280fa9dc709b6e7fcad6ee760373c976f008ab7c259208bef4c60e6ffa17044793320fb1ef5ef42c95bc8ab"
}