It is not a question that can be answered with a yes or no answer.
Within Linux you have more secure and less secure distributions, for example the default security of an Arch Linux is crap because it has neither apparmor nor selinux and putting it is a pain in the ass, nor secure boot.
Nor does OpenBSD offer the same security as FreeBSD, OpenBSD being considered the most secure operating system in the world.
I could summarize it this way from more security to less security.
OpenBSD > FreeBSD > Debian > Fedora > Arch Linux
As handicap of the BSD is that they do not support secureboot, although FreeBSD is in process.
Cyph3rp9nk
npub1ln…arrnt
2025-03-29 12:37:28
in reply to nevent1q…rgtv
Author Public Key
npub1lnms53w04qt742qnhxag5d6awy7nz6055flnmjkr6jg39hm86dlq7arrntPublished at
2025-03-29 12:37:28Event JSON
{
"id": "3119681cab320dfc2cac0001e0dc14a7b86164e38d1975ccfeee80b0d6b3b2a2",
"pubkey": "fcf70a45cfa817eaa813b9ba8a375d713d3169f4a27f3dcac3d49112df67d37e",
"created_at": 1743251848,
"kind": 1,
"tags": [
[
"e",
"4908c743b1fedde811dc4d39c6de8df6bfaeb71385a36f8154a99b5e56d6a9f9",
"wss://@nos.lol",
"root"
],
[
"e",
"a55b8fd4d718e3714713007043b01d01d0e47127a7ac4c88b731a10cae5a4870",
"wss://@nos.lol",
"reply"
],
[
"p",
"fcf70a45cfa817eaa813b9ba8a375d713d3169f4a27f3dcac3d49112df67d37e"
],
[
"p",
"151f346e3c7e7f55acdc004265950dee8cd12ce0996ad6e1321b8f158b50d890"
],
[
"r",
"wss://purplepag.es/"
],
[
"r",
"wss://nos.lol/"
],
[
"r",
"wss://nostr.bitcoiner.social/"
],
[
"r",
"wss://nostr.mom/"
],
[
"r",
"wss://nostr.oxtr.dev/"
],
[
"r",
"wss://nostr.zbd.gg/"
],
[
"r",
"wss://offchain.pub/"
],
[
"r",
"wss://premium.primal.net/"
],
[
"r",
"wss://relay.damus.io/"
],
[
"r",
"wss://relay.mostr.pub/"
],
[
"r",
"wss://relay.nos.social/"
],
[
"r",
"wss://relay.nostr.net/"
],
[
"r",
"wss://relay.primal.net/"
],
[
"r",
"wss://relay.snort.social/"
],
[
"r",
"wss://nostr-pub.wellorder.net/"
],
[
"r",
"wss://purplerelay.com/"
]
],
"content": "It is not a question that can be answered with a yes or no answer.\n\nWithin Linux you have more secure and less secure distributions, for example the default security of an Arch Linux is crap because it has neither apparmor nor selinux and putting it is a pain in the ass, nor secure boot.\n\nNor does OpenBSD offer the same security as FreeBSD, OpenBSD being considered the most secure operating system in the world.\n\nI could summarize it this way from more security to less security.\n\nOpenBSD \u003e FreeBSD \u003e Debian \u003e Fedora \u003e Arch Linux\n\nAs handicap of the BSD is that they do not support secureboot, although FreeBSD is in process.\n\n",
"sig": "a84c5e6d691860bdb08374fb0a880bb337fee19446521604929a19bd93f7eee30f91d6e3310133e45efc6aeb43e2c19d09ca7711b8c0d39f4941f36b1db2896d"
}