Some thoughts on various moderation systems:
Authoritarian - central authority makes all of the decisions with no input from the community. good (mostly) for adherence to terms, bad for fairness and transparency. bad for scaling.
Peer-to-peer - users make all of the decisions with no input from any authority. good for user control, but not great for scaling as very few would be willing to spend the time to moderate effectively. unhelpful for new user experience.
Democratic - community makes all of the decisions by arriving at a consensus through voting. good for fairness and transparency, unproven for scaling or adherence to terms.
jack@minds.com /
npub1u0…xxch4
2022-05-24 15:37:42
Author Public Key
npub1u0cvwtnmv5lnjhmyuq63nwhral4vrp9u7zel8z7ued32f542t5cqkxxch4Published at
2022-05-24 15:37:42Event JSON
{
"id": "324ed3c3f080357fdb9dc03a858a6b6ae2ca847214522973adb4c2e50d16cf44",
"pubkey": "e3f0c72e7b653f395f64e03519bae3efeac184bcf0b3f38bdccb62a4d2aa5d30",
"created_at": 1653406662,
"kind": 1,
"tags": [],
"content": "Some thoughts on various moderation systems:\n\nAuthoritarian - central authority makes all of the decisions with no input from the community. good (mostly) for adherence to terms, bad for fairness and transparency. bad for scaling. \n\nPeer-to-peer - users make all of the decisions with no input from any authority. good for user control, but not great for scaling as very few would be willing to spend the time to moderate effectively. unhelpful for new user experience.\n\nDemocratic - community makes all of the decisions by arriving at a consensus through voting. good for fairness and transparency, unproven for scaling or adherence to terms.",
"sig": "e52c89b33eaf471984ae9d3b9112f3bc58831c9c5e659ed9b14da3e8c9f1d166416e1c74f5785cd059d1b5f737ec721e551804fa2fcc6b104524961b7f7344bf"
}