1- A.I.:Iraq War: Widely criticized globally, especially after no WMDs were found.
1- look at this polish jew from 2002
https://youtube.com/shorts/33vOBjMpXTo?si=9HCIjP6HI54VQzc8
2- A.I.:Syrian oil: U.S. military presence in oil-rich areas of Syria has drawn criticism.
2- All syrian oil cohencidently end up jews gas tanks, they "allegedly" buy it while Syrians occasionally freeze to death in winter
https://en.globes.co.il/en/article-israel-buys-most-oil-smuggled-from-isis-territory-report-1001084873
3- A.I.:Palestinian blockade: Gaza's sea and air blockade is enforced by Israel (and Egypt), and is a major point of humanitarian concern.
3- My fault jews have nothing to do with that
4- A.I.:Wahhabism: A specific interpretation of Islam mainly promoted by Saudi Arabia. It's controversial but not universally accepted by Muslims.
4- Wahabisim is the invention of the1st saudi state (btw they teach that in school)
You can check the first 5 lines from its wiki article https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/First_Saudi_state
The founder full name: Muhammad bin Saud bin Muqrin bin Murkhan bin ... bin ... Al Muqrin Al Saud
"Murkhan" is a Hebrew word, it's not even Arabaised like my name "Josephe" -> "Yousif" and no arab uses that name it's classically Jewish as "Cohen"
The full name is available in the Arabic wiki page unlike the English version shorter displayed name
(Also I heard that fact from tons of Saud family members)
5- A.I.:"Inventing Jordan": Jordan became a state post-WWI under British rule, not something “invented” in a vacuum.
5- the jew from above (the grand grandchild of Murkhan) was exclusively the first warlord to introduce automatic machine guns to Arabia, he got it from jew British generals as the latter petrayed their allies the royal family of mekkah, and with inferior rifles the royal family was lucky to escape mekkah to Jordan.
5- A.I.: JPEGs on BTC blocks: Refers to Ordinals/inscriptions — a niche technical debate in the Bitcoin community
5- just look at that
quoting
nevent1q…sf04
What you’ve posted includes a mix of serious geopolitical concerns, controversial opinions, and a blatantly false and offensive misrepresentation of Islamic scripture.
Let’s break this down clearly and respectfully:
1. Claim: "‘Fuck the Jews...’ is a legitimate prayer mentioned in the Quran – Al-Ma'idah 5:72"
False.
There is no such verse in the Quran that says anything close to that, let alone in Surah Al-Ma'idah (5:72). That verse actually discusses the theological disagreement between Islam and Christianity regarding the divinity of Jesus, not about Jews, and definitely not using such language.
Here is the actual content of Surah Al-Ma’idah (5:72):
> "They have certainly disbelieved who say, 'Allah is the Messiah, the son of Mary' while the Messiah has said, 'O Children of Israel, worship Allah, my Lord and your Lord.' Indeed, he who associates others with Allah – Allah has forbidden him Paradise, and his refuge is the Fire. And there are not for the wrongdoers any helpers."
(Quran 5:72, Sahih International)
The Quran does critique some actions of groups in historical context (including some Jews, Christians, and Muslims), but it never condones hatred toward entire ethnic or religious groups, and never in vulgar terms.
---
2. Topics like war, oil theft, Jordan, Wahhabism, and Palestine
Many of these are complex political and historical issues:
Iraq War: Widely criticized globally, especially after no WMDs were found.
Syrian oil: U.S. military presence in oil-rich areas of Syria has drawn criticism.
Palestinian blockade: Gaza's sea and air blockade is enforced by Israel (and Egypt), and is a major point of humanitarian concern.
Wahhabism: A specific interpretation of Islam mainly promoted by Saudi Arabia. It's controversial but not universally accepted by Muslims.
"Inventing Jordan": Jordan became a state post-WWI under British rule, not something “invented” in a vacuum.
JPEGs on BTC blocks: Refers to Ordinals/inscriptions — a niche technical debate in the Bitcoin community.
---
3. Freedom of speech vs hate speech
You’re welcome to express frustrations or criticize policies, but spreading hate speech, especially falsely attributing it to sacred texts, crosses a line — both ethically and factually.
---
If you're trying to make a point about suppression, hypocrisy, or injustice, it’s possible to do so powerfully without using misinformation or hate. I'm happy to help you explore those issues factually and constructively.
Would you like a breakdown of actual Islamic or Jewish teachings on coexistence or how various countries shaped Middle Eastern borders?