Jeff Garzik [ARCHIVE] on Nostr: 📅 Original date posted:2015-06-19 📝 Original message:On Fri, Jun 19, 2015 at ...
📅 Original date posted:2015-06-19
📝 Original message:On Fri, Jun 19, 2015 at 10:48 AM, <justusranvier at riseup.net> wrote:
> On 2015-06-19 17:40, Jeff Garzik wrote:
>
>> Making multiple incompatible versions of a spend is a -requirement- of
>> various refund contract protocols.
>>
>
> Is there not a dedicated field in a transaction (nSequence) for express
> purpose of indicating when a protocol like this is in use?
>
No. You cannot know which is the 'right' or wrong transaction. One tx has
obvious nSequence adjustments, the other - the refund transaction - may not.
--
Jeff Garzik
Bitcoin core developer and open source evangelist
BitPay, Inc.
https://bitpay.com/-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <
http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/attachments/20150619/260466f9/attachment.html>
Published at
2023-06-07 15:39:14Event JSON
{
"id": "322a7360d7299e5d4aa9c4920532eae74fa17de5d4de54c319a4db5f751e8313",
"pubkey": "b25e10e25d470d9b215521b50da0dfe7a209bec7fedeb53860c3e180ffdc8c11",
"created_at": 1686152354,
"kind": 1,
"tags": [
[
"e",
"6b4025f674cbd304cabd44490b09b3ceb927f752f6a9f4513b25fefc95bdc008",
"",
"root"
],
[
"e",
"f56ab247e108656480ba3892d7905e43ce3bbd704752b28887c27b1533677e44",
"",
"reply"
],
[
"p",
"027567a4e17dce56d63f7b2665183420d28913e75a237b20f25938d1ffe872b9"
]
],
"content": "📅 Original date posted:2015-06-19\n📝 Original message:On Fri, Jun 19, 2015 at 10:48 AM, \u003cjustusranvier at riseup.net\u003e wrote:\n\n\u003e On 2015-06-19 17:40, Jeff Garzik wrote:\n\u003e\n\u003e\u003e Making multiple incompatible versions of a spend is a -requirement- of\n\u003e\u003e various refund contract protocols.\n\u003e\u003e\n\u003e\n\u003e Is there not a dedicated field in a transaction (nSequence) for express\n\u003e purpose of indicating when a protocol like this is in use?\n\u003e\n\nNo. You cannot know which is the 'right' or wrong transaction. One tx has\nobvious nSequence adjustments, the other - the refund transaction - may not.\n\n-- \nJeff Garzik\nBitcoin core developer and open source evangelist\nBitPay, Inc. https://bitpay.com/\n-------------- next part --------------\nAn HTML attachment was scrubbed...\nURL: \u003chttp://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/attachments/20150619/260466f9/attachment.html\u003e",
"sig": "f429f89933a249690a047be77fc85ee40638612c5a498cae65eb51d50b2cfb5075b83e257c675b9952fa424d250fc11ca3fe727c1dae2c47b48cf0814aecb58e"
}