📅 Original date posted:2021-10-10
📝 Original message:
> H( private-key, msg, other-party's-nonce-pair, 1 )
That should work. I had thought that other-party's-nonce-pair would be unique
unknown randomness, but I can see now that it can be rederived from RA(n) or
RB(n).
> Hmm, you had me panicking that I'd been describing how to combine the
> two despite having decided it wasn't necessary to combine them...
Ah, should have read that part more closely. The proposal uses the single sig
adaptor sig variant.
Jonas Nick [ARCHIVE] /
npub1at…y3z5a
2023-06-09 13:04:07
in reply to nevent1q…zvwn
Author Public Key
npub1at3pav59gkeqz9kegzqhk2v4j4r435x42ytf23pxs8crt74tuc8s2y3z5aPublished at
2023-06-09 13:04:07Event JSON
{
"id": "3320f0442b29550e8884fc7750009ecc9b391186c11037dcf6a417d738307a24",
"pubkey": "eae21eb28545b20116d940817b2995954758d0d5511695442681f035faabe60f",
"created_at": 1686315847,
"kind": 1,
"tags": [
[
"e",
"bfc4ed728b228b9341f3493f5bd7d935423e85bd9d039717f691001784a42238",
"",
"root"
],
[
"e",
"9c70e67f01b5e887a9542f39cba38a6801b56493ca6370c832fbf8b31d389e5a",
"",
"reply"
],
[
"p",
"f0feda6ad58ea9f486e469f87b3b9996494363a26982b864667c5d8acb0542ab"
]
],
"content": "📅 Original date posted:2021-10-10\n📝 Original message:\n\u003e H( private-key, msg, other-party's-nonce-pair, 1 )\n\nThat should work. I had thought that other-party's-nonce-pair would be unique\nunknown randomness, but I can see now that it can be rederived from RA(n) or\nRB(n).\n\n \u003e Hmm, you had me panicking that I'd been describing how to combine the\n \u003e two despite having decided it wasn't necessary to combine them...\n\nAh, should have read that part more closely. The proposal uses the single sig\nadaptor sig variant.",
"sig": "1185addc8addbff1f24a901cc277e7abec0737a1b1511916950963c2b1f815a1b8f4a58346583d627bb6e09efbce27f6eb8bf485d88ae2a54ea3e459ea1c2c2e"
}