📅 Original date posted:2014-04-08
📝 Original message:On Tue, Apr 8, 2014 at 5:58 PM, Andreas Schildbach <andreas at schildbach.de>wrote:
> On 04/08/2014 05:46 PM, slush wrote:
>
> > It still doesn't mean that bitcoinj or Electrum cannot share the bare
> > minimum of BIP XX. Of course if somebody will use Electrum for 2to3
> > transactions and then move wallet to client which does not offer such
> > feature, it won't work. But I don't see that as a problem.
>
> There is no "bare minimum". Either you implement the "BIP" fully or not.
>
I didn't mean "Bare minimum of some spec", but "spec describing bare
minimum", which is different. I'm sorry for confusion.
Marek
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/attachments/20140408/792dd287/attachment.html>;
slush [ARCHIVE] /
npub1ad…gl2p6
2023-06-07 15:18:06
in reply to nevent1q…x9t0
Author Public Key
npub1ad7209g90jnu400x74quws0xv8gpxs2fxnjexnpwqnrxwa39exdq5gl2p6Published at
2023-06-07 15:18:06Event JSON
{
"id": "365eedc43553153e16e0dff9db24d1ab17b159f4fb6a1ece98299c86ca258225",
"pubkey": "eb7ca795057ca7cabde6f541c741e661d013414934e5934c2e04c6677625c99a",
"created_at": 1686151086,
"kind": 1,
"tags": [
[
"e",
"3d6a81230db6ab232d8356d3ea7e609f18aff1b8f11502ea70755e81b0de88f9",
"",
"root"
],
[
"e",
"c633d75d2de77117746484f5fa0546169439f300f30dabbb7d9e1e0c131fa027",
"",
"reply"
],
[
"p",
"3215b3d77dff1f84eeb5ad46fb1206a8d1657b3ea765a80b5489ece3a702d2bc"
]
],
"content": "📅 Original date posted:2014-04-08\n📝 Original message:On Tue, Apr 8, 2014 at 5:58 PM, Andreas Schildbach \u003candreas at schildbach.de\u003ewrote:\n\n\u003e On 04/08/2014 05:46 PM, slush wrote:\n\u003e\n\u003e \u003e It still doesn't mean that bitcoinj or Electrum cannot share the bare\n\u003e \u003e minimum of BIP XX. Of course if somebody will use Electrum for 2to3\n\u003e \u003e transactions and then move wallet to client which does not offer such\n\u003e \u003e feature, it won't work. But I don't see that as a problem.\n\u003e\n\u003e There is no \"bare minimum\". Either you implement the \"BIP\" fully or not.\n\u003e\n\nI didn't mean \"Bare minimum of some spec\", but \"spec describing bare\nminimum\", which is different. I'm sorry for confusion.\n\nMarek\n-------------- next part --------------\nAn HTML attachment was scrubbed...\nURL: \u003chttp://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/attachments/20140408/792dd287/attachment.html\u003e",
"sig": "cd8ce0e59c3b5b9b398155273ef83c5d5e9d3b1afced4e3cba7715faaf2b1970ea9d353b2a4e5b7291359e3d28c782c50ba9ad9b922fd06ebfc0147a9d40a892"
}