📅 Original date posted:2015-05-28
📝 Original message:On Thu, May 28, 2015 at 1:34 PM, Mike Hearn <mike at plan99.net> wrote:
> As noted, many miners just accept the defaults. With your proposed change
>> their target would effectively *drop* from 1mb to 800kb today, which
>> seems crazy. That's the exact opposite of what is needed right now.
>>
>
> I am very skeptical about this idea.
>
By the time a hard fork can happen, I expect average block size will be
above 500K.
Would you support a rule that was "larger of 1MB or 2x average size" ? That
is strictly better than the situation we're in today.
--
--
Gavin Andresen
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/attachments/20150528/fada3906/attachment.html>;
Gavin Andresen [ARCHIVE] /
npub1s4…d44kw
2023-06-07 15:34:05
in reply to nevent1q…wstp
Author Public Key
npub1s4lj77xuzcu7wy04afcr487f0r3za0f8n2775xrpkld2sv639mjqsd44kwPublished at
2023-06-07 15:34:05Event JSON
{
"id": "3852e7dd50dca345489256031870dc3d38c3be2c6fa03282ae338903dfbe6a99",
"pubkey": "857f2f78dc1639e711f5ea703a9fc978e22ebd279abdea1861b7daa833512ee4",
"created_at": 1686152045,
"kind": 1,
"tags": [
[
"e",
"aec396df7693e37c124fbd2891fe6c4a3b28f46e7fbc3f304a7b1d78d2f5ffbe",
"",
"root"
],
[
"e",
"3a21c3d687d880bb8e13e55b1574102b9ef86d614cfcf7709da19a1bb7b8b193",
"",
"reply"
],
[
"p",
"f2c95df3766562e3b96b79a0254881c59e8639f23987846961cf55412a77f6f2"
]
],
"content": "📅 Original date posted:2015-05-28\n📝 Original message:On Thu, May 28, 2015 at 1:34 PM, Mike Hearn \u003cmike at plan99.net\u003e wrote:\n\n\u003e As noted, many miners just accept the defaults. With your proposed change\n\u003e\u003e their target would effectively *drop* from 1mb to 800kb today, which\n\u003e\u003e seems crazy. That's the exact opposite of what is needed right now.\n\u003e\u003e\n\u003e\n\u003e I am very skeptical about this idea.\n\u003e\n\nBy the time a hard fork can happen, I expect average block size will be\nabove 500K.\n\nWould you support a rule that was \"larger of 1MB or 2x average size\" ? That\nis strictly better than the situation we're in today.\n\n-- \n--\nGavin Andresen\n-------------- next part --------------\nAn HTML attachment was scrubbed...\nURL: \u003chttp://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/attachments/20150528/fada3906/attachment.html\u003e",
"sig": "363432100e571879ad450175e478e6104cf32f28391c8714d47d2d4a1c40b3cf5efd12b979b6d1ea45e02116d378dfdef6eaa4e3e87321ec181fa005384d1c22"
}