š
Original date posted:2016-02-02
š Original message:On Mon, Feb 1, 2016 at 5:53 PM, Luke Dashjr via bitcoin-dev <
bitcoin-dev at lists.linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
> I've completed an initial draft of a BIP that provides clarifications on
> the
> Status field for BIPs, as well as adding the ability for public comments on
> them, and expanding the list of allowable BIP licenses.
>
>
> https://github.com/luke-jr/bips/blob/bip-biprevised/bip-biprevised.mediawiki
>
> I plan to open discussion of making this BIP an Active status (along with
> BIP
> 123) a month after initial revisions have completed. Please provide any
> objections now, so I can try to address them now and enable consensus to be
> reached.
>
I like the more concrete definitions of the various statuses.
I don't like the definition of "consensus". I think the definition
described gives too much centralized control to whoever controls the
mailing list and the wiki.
--
--
Gavin Andresen
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/attachments/20160202/e4d356b4/attachment.html>;
Gavin Andresen [ARCHIVE] /
npub1s4ā¦d44kw
2023-06-07 17:48:22
in reply to nevent1qā¦d4lt
Author Public Key
npub1s4lj77xuzcu7wy04afcr487f0r3za0f8n2775xrpkld2sv639mjqsd44kwPublished at
2023-06-07 17:48:22Event JSON
{
"id": "31ae7e500022744dd26b03588fb0cdf70a8dc39291fdfef56760da936ce2be1a",
"pubkey": "857f2f78dc1639e711f5ea703a9fc978e22ebd279abdea1861b7daa833512ee4",
"created_at": 1686160102,
"kind": 1,
"tags": [
[
"e",
"3fc3fb490099c294c2e6fd9121e2b041d03ad828592794b617d1387be19ddf83",
"",
"root"
],
[
"e",
"ad47668951c53bd0d71ffe7358069e0bc99312b83f920684ffa0c63742b970b1",
"",
"reply"
],
[
"p",
"a384795310cea1937dda4d01ee8f14ca734b9a7ab60c62114a5656706e15e47f"
]
],
"content": "š
Original date posted:2016-02-02\nš Original message:On Mon, Feb 1, 2016 at 5:53 PM, Luke Dashjr via bitcoin-dev \u003c\nbitcoin-dev at lists.linuxfoundation.org\u003e wrote:\n\n\u003e I've completed an initial draft of a BIP that provides clarifications on\n\u003e the\n\u003e Status field for BIPs, as well as adding the ability for public comments on\n\u003e them, and expanding the list of allowable BIP licenses.\n\u003e\n\u003e\n\u003e https://github.com/luke-jr/bips/blob/bip-biprevised/bip-biprevised.mediawiki\n\u003e\n\u003e I plan to open discussion of making this BIP an Active status (along with\n\u003e BIP\n\u003e 123) a month after initial revisions have completed. Please provide any\n\u003e objections now, so I can try to address them now and enable consensus to be\n\u003e reached.\n\u003e\n\n\nI like the more concrete definitions of the various statuses.\n\nI don't like the definition of \"consensus\". I think the definition\ndescribed gives too much centralized control to whoever controls the\nmailing list and the wiki.\n\n-- \n--\nGavin Andresen\n-------------- next part --------------\nAn HTML attachment was scrubbed...\nURL: \u003chttp://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/attachments/20160202/e4d356b4/attachment.html\u003e",
"sig": "9af854c198c675dc0eb5b9155ad74338a0d81a6868555b4a84723cd07d875f13acec06f20cf8690e384fc3999e64159fe4b72ce4ac3c878816e59d7d3ef0930f"
}