📅 Original date posted:2012-06-26
📝 Original message:On Tue, Jun 26, 2012 at 7:01 PM, grarpamp <grarpamp at gmail.com> wrote:
> You are going to want to include the block of the Phatom project as well:
> https://code.google.com/p/phantom/
> fd00:2522:3493::/48
Perhaps some argument to add blocks to the IsRoutable check is in
order? Then people who use overlay networks that are actually
routable but which use otherwise private space can just add the
relevant blocks.
> Note that while these blocks are not expected to be routable, that
> people may in fact have interfaces, routing tables and packet filters
> on their machines configured with up to all three of those networks
> for the purposes therein.
Note that while the hidden service support in bitcoin uses a
compatible IPv6 mapping with onioncat, it is _not_ onioncat, does not
use onioncat, does not need onioncat, and wouldn't benefit from
onioncat. The onioncat style advertisement is used because our
protocol already relays IPv6 addresses. The connections are regular
tor hidden service connections, not the more-risky and low performance
ip in tcp onioncat stuff.
Gregory Maxwell [ARCHIVE] /
npub1f2…crwet
2023-06-07 10:19:24
in reply to nevent1q…5gfk
Author Public Key
npub1f2nvlx49er5c7sqa43src6ssyp6snd4qwvtkwm5avc2l84cs84esecrwetSeen on
wss://relay.noswhere.comPublished at
2023-06-07 10:19:24Event JSON
{
"id": "31a6f80ce9938a644400710327142772c4dd59e00b19840a3a444abcdad2c2d8",
"pubkey": "4aa6cf9aa5c8e98f401dac603c6a10207509b6a07317676e9d6615f3d7103d73",
"created_at": 1686133164,
"kind": 1,
"tags": [
[
"e",
"8673be66f7fc6071bb567ee4601ef1d16e1703ad776437d0d1dc54fe0c26aea1",
"",
"root"
],
[
"e",
"ff3cc51df8afd227af3133e1a28395e16d95de11cc64fe3ecf0611b3584a6fa6",
"",
"reply"
],
[
"p",
"1c840f1e75d7845e20cc48358219b63ce235ccf72a89298d799e6bda2907af87"
]
],
"content": "📅 Original date posted:2012-06-26\n📝 Original message:On Tue, Jun 26, 2012 at 7:01 PM, grarpamp \u003cgrarpamp at gmail.com\u003e wrote:\n\u003e You are going to want to include the block of the Phatom project as well:\n\u003e https://code.google.com/p/phantom/\n\u003e fd00:2522:3493::/48\n\nPerhaps some argument to add blocks to the IsRoutable check is in\norder? Then people who use overlay networks that are actually\nroutable but which use otherwise private space can just add the\nrelevant blocks.\n\n\u003e Note that while these blocks are not expected to be routable, that\n\u003e people may in fact have interfaces, routing tables and packet filters\n\u003e on their machines configured with up to all three of those networks\n\u003e for the purposes therein.\n\nNote that while the hidden service support in bitcoin uses a\ncompatible IPv6 mapping with onioncat, it is _not_ onioncat, does not\nuse onioncat, does not need onioncat, and wouldn't benefit from\nonioncat. The onioncat style advertisement is used because our\nprotocol already relays IPv6 addresses. The connections are regular\ntor hidden service connections, not the more-risky and low performance\nip in tcp onioncat stuff.",
"sig": "1628a1ccc791fdf21eeb895314a92784335abd700332d36845e8bcb15bf4e47dfa9ae9a6a8f2414f004e9cc5c18e3e5c93448679e889aa2bfb04538725de1fc8"
}