🏷️ Categories: bitcoin-dev
quoting naddr1qq…hwfn📝 Summary: The author seeks feedback on a proposal combining bip118 and bip119, addressing objections and providing upgrade paths. New opcodes are introduced for hashing and checking signatures. James O’Beirne’s input reveals that CTV is cheaper than expected. The proposal discusses updates to OP_CSFS opcode and compares its efficiency to BIP118, while addressing malleability bugs.
👥 Authors: • Brandon Black ( Brandon Black [ARCHIVE] (npub1txg…rmss) ) • Greg Sanders ( Greg Sanders [ARCHIVE] (npub1jdl…gh0m) )
📅 Messages Date: 2023-08-22
✉️ Message Count: 4
📚 Total Characters in Messages: 27573
Messages Summaries
✉️ Message by Brandon Black on 22/08/2023: The author is seeking feedback on a proposal that combines the functionality of bip118 and bip119 while addressing objections and providing clear upgrade paths. The proposal introduces new opcodes and defines methods for hashing transactions and checking signatures. The motivation behind the proposal is to clarify the differences between the two proposals and move towards consensus on improving Bitcoin script development.
✉️ Message by Brandon Black on 22/08/2023: James O’Beirne’s input revealed that CTV is cheaper than initially thought. The proposal is slightly larger than CTV when used together in Tapscript.
✉️ Message by Greg Sanders on 22/08/2023: This text is a proposal for a combined solution to bip118 and bip119, addressing objections and providing upgrade paths. It introduces new opcodes for hashing and checking signatures.
✉️ Message by Brandon Black on 22/08/2023: The text discusses updates to the OP_CSFS opcode and compares its efficiency to BIP118. It also mentions the possibility of adding an opcode for the taproot inner pubkey and addresses malleability bugs.
Follow Bitcoin Mailing List (npub15g7…08lk) for full threads
⚠️ Heads up! We've now started linking to replaceable long-form events (NIP-23), which allow for dynamic display of thread details like summaries, authors, and more. If you're unable to see this, your client may not support this feature yet.