š
Original date posted:2017-04-15
š Original message:On Sat, Apr 15, 2017 at 8:42 AM, Mark Friedenbach via bitcoin-dev
<bitcoin-dev at lists.linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
> The alternative [Greg presents] (new BIP bit) has the clear downside
> of not triggering BIP141 activation, and therefore not enabling the
> new consensus rules on already deployed full nodes. BIP148 is making
> an explicit choice to favor dragging along those users which have
> upgraded to BIP141 support over those miners who have failed to
> upgrade.
A proposal from yesterday would separate this concern; though not
retroactively. One way to name this proposal would be "Catch-All
Segwit Activation".
"extended BIP9 activation of segwit, for legacy nodes"
https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/2017-April/014160.html
If this release valve exists, then discussions (such as this thread)
can get back to focusing on finding the safest incentive-compatible
transitions, with time improving the situation instead of making it worse.
Ryan Grant [ARCHIVE] /
npub19aā¦6mwcl
2023-06-07 18:00:12
in reply to nevent1qā¦8e0d
Author Public Key
npub19a2m7qm80t7mzhgqfgunswhm5c3q4fkqt89057ugy7u8jdxncf2q06mwclPublished at
2023-06-07 18:00:12Event JSON
{
"id": "30eba204ad1028cc4528807d317af76bc7b952433ae5e800c9fdfe2c44ada768",
"pubkey": "2f55bf03677afdb15d004a39383afba6220aa6c059cafa7b8827b87934d3c254",
"created_at": 1686160812,
"kind": 1,
"tags": [
[
"e",
"5d1e64c970da07b0178aa4b0869114a6c0b54023e99bc79f83d180601afc646b",
"",
"root"
],
[
"e",
"82dfaec8bacbd69acb8a408b3b45d79f920af9a04a9435a3ab05c0b4f8b9a0a9",
"",
"reply"
],
[
"p",
"1c61d995949cbfaf14f767784e166bde865c7b8783d7aa3bf0a1d014b70c0069"
]
],
"content": "š
Original date posted:2017-04-15\nš Original message:On Sat, Apr 15, 2017 at 8:42 AM, Mark Friedenbach via bitcoin-dev\n\u003cbitcoin-dev at lists.linuxfoundation.org\u003e wrote:\n\u003e The alternative [Greg presents] (new BIP bit) has the clear downside\n\u003e of not triggering BIP141 activation, and therefore not enabling the\n\u003e new consensus rules on already deployed full nodes. BIP148 is making\n\u003e an explicit choice to favor dragging along those users which have\n\u003e upgraded to BIP141 support over those miners who have failed to\n\u003e upgrade.\n\nA proposal from yesterday would separate this concern; though not\nretroactively. One way to name this proposal would be \"Catch-All\nSegwit Activation\".\n\n \"extended BIP9 activation of segwit, for legacy nodes\"\n https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/2017-April/014160.html\n\nIf this release valve exists, then discussions (such as this thread)\ncan get back to focusing on finding the safest incentive-compatible\ntransitions, with time improving the situation instead of making it worse.",
"sig": "d1a04283a7e413f3ce39d0fb66e605bb3e3ec3ef766e485009e0b239cfb1e0f28903448b19ce5d84f97aad1e44d00117541dec8c61b848e94238b90f1630460b"
}