Miguel Afonso Caetano on Nostr: Now that's a truly SOCIALIST & LEFT political program for the 21st century. ...
Now that's a truly SOCIALIST & LEFT political program for the 21st century. Unfortunately, most of the pseudo left commentariat and political forces are only interested in discussing the sex of angels while the world burns and capitalism provokes greater depression worldwide.
#Ecosocialism #AnarchoCommunism #PublicGoods #Capitalism #Environmentalism: "Kropotkin’s argument stands today. It would not take much, as a share of total global productive capacity, to ensure decent lives for everyone on the planet. But with the reality of the ecological crisis, we must also face a second challenge, one that Kropotkin could not appreciate in the nineteenth century: to achieve well-being for all while at the same time reducing aggregate use of energy and materials (specifically in the core) to enable sufficiently rapid decarbonization and to bring the world economy back within planetary boundaries. Technological innovation and efficiency improvements are crucial to this, but high-income countries also need to scale down less-necessary forms of production in order to reduce excess energy and material use directly.
If capitalism has always been unable to achieve the former goal (well-being for all), it most certainly cannot achieve the latter. It is a structural impossibility, as it runs against the core logic of the capitalist economy, which is to increase aggregate production indefinitely, to maintain the conditions for perpetual accumulation.
It is clear what needs to be done: we must achieve democratic control over finance and production, as Kropotkin argued, and now organize it around the double goal of well-being and ecology. This requires that we distinguish, as Kropotkin did, between the socially necessary production that clearly needs to increase for social progress, and the destructive and less-necessary forms of production that urgently need to be scaled down. This is the revolutionary world-historical objective that faces our generation."
https://monthlyreview.org/2023/09/01/the-double-objective-of-democratic-ecosocialism/Published at
2023-09-04 18:02:15Event JSON
{
"id": "3dc599ce0b3298aa605606196306d6dee25a762bdeabc948be8e9d9f4fa507c1",
"pubkey": "0bb8cfad2c4ef2f694feb68708f67a94d85b29d15080df8174b8485e471b6683",
"created_at": 1693850535,
"kind": 1,
"tags": [
[
"t",
"ecosocialism"
],
[
"t",
"anarchocommunism"
],
[
"t",
"publicgoods"
],
[
"t",
"capitalism"
],
[
"t",
"environmentalism"
],
[
"proxy",
"https://tldr.nettime.org/users/remixtures/statuses/111008188704421470",
"activitypub"
]
],
"content": "Now that's a truly SOCIALIST \u0026 LEFT political program for the 21st century. Unfortunately, most of the pseudo left commentariat and political forces are only interested in discussing the sex of angels while the world burns and capitalism provokes greater depression worldwide.\n\n#Ecosocialism #AnarchoCommunism #PublicGoods #Capitalism #Environmentalism: \"Kropotkin’s argument stands today. It would not take much, as a share of total global productive capacity, to ensure decent lives for everyone on the planet. But with the reality of the ecological crisis, we must also face a second challenge, one that Kropotkin could not appreciate in the nineteenth century: to achieve well-being for all while at the same time reducing aggregate use of energy and materials (specifically in the core) to enable sufficiently rapid decarbonization and to bring the world economy back within planetary boundaries. Technological innovation and efficiency improvements are crucial to this, but high-income countries also need to scale down less-necessary forms of production in order to reduce excess energy and material use directly.\n\nIf capitalism has always been unable to achieve the former goal (well-being for all), it most certainly cannot achieve the latter. It is a structural impossibility, as it runs against the core logic of the capitalist economy, which is to increase aggregate production indefinitely, to maintain the conditions for perpetual accumulation.\n\nIt is clear what needs to be done: we must achieve democratic control over finance and production, as Kropotkin argued, and now organize it around the double goal of well-being and ecology. This requires that we distinguish, as Kropotkin did, between the socially necessary production that clearly needs to increase for social progress, and the destructive and less-necessary forms of production that urgently need to be scaled down. This is the revolutionary world-historical objective that faces our generation.\"\n\nhttps://monthlyreview.org/2023/09/01/the-double-objective-of-democratic-ecosocialism/",
"sig": "0367c792963045b88174a052d4d69f44a5185a71f7d25957f96fddbf13c50326b19f8ee56af90ec2bb1b0ee7dc3f7af2519efe1ac7c939aef7a1c61660db9a6b"
}