grolsch on Nostr: Not really. Is not intended to correct wealth distribution, but it does correct ...
Not really. Is not intended to correct wealth distribution, but it does correct debasement which affects mainly the poor.
At the end, early adopters could be extremely rich, yes. They could also expend those bitcoins and continue its distribution. But there is no part of the Bitcoin thesis that is supposed to be a socialist project.
It levels the playing field, but you still have to earn your sats.
Published at
2023-10-07 15:33:11Event JSON
{
"id": "3fce529886a4aa277eeb41b3aedb8bd00348f2f8633050a2d6b058f9facd6bef",
"pubkey": "01af055db49f4f775c2359104890942be1a2b98dbf4b2bb4f2e1f1e941b10bd9",
"created_at": 1696692791,
"kind": 1,
"tags": [
[
"e",
"c40138436f7d894759ddd5522bf4b66ae2aac25c4b70b166099631c55cdcb67a"
],
[
"p",
"b624f6d00150f62f69eb305d3339db2ff98d5ce777b89d2cfbe7569717494791"
]
],
"content": "Not really. Is not intended to correct wealth distribution, but it does correct debasement which affects mainly the poor. \n\nAt the end, early adopters could be extremely rich, yes. They could also expend those bitcoins and continue its distribution. But there is no part of the Bitcoin thesis that is supposed to be a socialist project. \n\nIt levels the playing field, but you still have to earn your sats.",
"sig": "9ceb18860079eebc9787872585e5f6a3d3f83d91afeb1f491e3c2572df7dd01961aa5e345f3f1fad12a9ccbe923131201b00cc19f465aaf1e40e322b28d7547f"
}