BitcoinStu on Nostr: you probably won't prove it though, because as a bcash user you don't care about the ...

you probably won't prove it though, because as a bcash user you don't care about the motto "don't trust, verify". You're the kind of guy who takes someone else's node as truth.

Reality though is you can't prove it, because you do not control any old addresses.

Likely you're young, probably under 30, no kids, no wife. You have some education but not a high earning job. You have not managed to build any wealth yet. You read bitcoin.com and were tricked into believing that some old failed fork is the "real" bitcoin. You put what little money you have into it, but of course it's only going down.

But you're really that special kind of stupid. You've had me, and doubtlessly many others explain to you why small blocks are the correct answer... but you just feel like you're too late to bitcoin. You'll never be a "whole coiner". But in bcash, wow you can have several full bcashes. But for this fantasy to play out you NEED bcash to rise from the dead and the whole world needs to wake up to the reality that only you and the 3 other bcash shills know so well... only bcash can free you from debt slavery.

Honestly though, if you don't care about running your own node to validate the entire chain and tx throughput if what you're after for your "global payment system" on the base layer... you really should study Kaspa. It's fascinating technology. It makes those bcash blocks look really small in comparison. It's incredibly data-dense per unit of time, orders of magnitude faster than bcash.

Personally I would never own kaspa or use it because it's not trustless. A full node only validates some of the chain and you have to rely on others, just like in bcash. So it's not for me.

But kaspa is much better than bcash. Just sayin'