No one has a right to be served educational content in a YouTube feed without searching. It's not unethical for him to make his own content harder to access.
Your 2 solutions is to make burner channels on YouTube, and to use rumble.
If you keep making new YouTube channels as your banned, that's no better than nostr. You will never be able to grow too much before they find you again and re ban you. It's a permanent treadmill, and you need to keep a local archive of your content anyways which is what you said was too difficult.
If you use rumble, you are still losing all the normie-discoverability of YouTube and not gaining much for it. Having a benevolent owner is not sustainable. He might have the money to sustain it now, but it's a money pit and at some point he's gonna have to stop burning money. If it ever grows to be relevant, it's gonna be stopped by either its corporate dependencies (AWS/cloudflare like with Parlor) or the government like is happening with the Telegram founder.
Rumble might be 10x bigger than nostr but it's still tiny and will be shot down before it grows, even if the owner keeps it going. You need a system that doesn't lose momentum when it's dependencies are shot down. That's what nostr is focused on. Expecting a benevolent CEO to host your content forever for free is just naive.
hamsi / Karadenizli
npub15r…t7dpl
2024-08-26 16:57:49
in reply to nevent1q…5s5m
Author Public Key
npub15r9hp5eq3a0heantnja4sth3ug277nhse9f3scu937mxfh0mpw8snt7dplPublished at
2024-08-26 16:57:49Event JSON
{
"id": "3967c3ffde1e228ad171da36620cea67dff7b81f60e4a4514a351c5d8611f204",
"pubkey": "a0cb70d3208f5f7cf66b9cbb582ef1e215ef4ef0c9531863858fb664ddfb0b8f",
"created_at": 1724691469,
"kind": 1,
"tags": [
[
"e",
"fb90feaa7f73e63ac483bde4722b19737791fc653f06c8394440437298633dc7",
"",
"root"
],
[
"e",
"8f1e879c3431062fd3a7690e582ca76552ff758623b9f56889011ec1d44deae9"
],
[
"e",
"9384b17e9bd221edc19b12d75095e86ab1efa980335852c147539233429f594c",
"",
"reply"
],
[
"p",
"82341f882b6eabcd2ba7f1ef90aad961cf074af15b9ef44a09f9d2a8fbfbe6a2"
],
[
"p",
"c6209b5936aea5092e677e3817b25329e1fb5f206ea8b8e97c59d4ab35ac6e0c"
]
],
"content": "No one has a right to be served educational content in a YouTube feed without searching. It's not unethical for him to make his own content harder to access. \n\nYour 2 solutions is to make burner channels on YouTube, and to use rumble. \n\nIf you keep making new YouTube channels as your banned, that's no better than nostr. You will never be able to grow too much before they find you again and re ban you. It's a permanent treadmill, and you need to keep a local archive of your content anyways which is what you said was too difficult. \n\nIf you use rumble, you are still losing all the normie-discoverability of YouTube and not gaining much for it. Having a benevolent owner is not sustainable. He might have the money to sustain it now, but it's a money pit and at some point he's gonna have to stop burning money. If it ever grows to be relevant, it's gonna be stopped by either its corporate dependencies (AWS/cloudflare like with Parlor) or the government like is happening with the Telegram founder. \n\nRumble might be 10x bigger than nostr but it's still tiny and will be shot down before it grows, even if the owner keeps it going. You need a system that doesn't lose momentum when it's dependencies are shot down. That's what nostr is focused on. Expecting a benevolent CEO to host your content forever for free is just naive. ",
"sig": "b7df838aeffacb27f79575a4e16103d9a6ab57f598b835115fa9ffc7a0200c9ccc0dd34fe5eb62c82f8fb64a432e5ef8ea2240e9e15598baf9a1859920fbbcb4"
}