š
Original date posted:2017-04-11
š Original message:I've changed the proposal so only 8 bits are given to grinding so something
like 20 bits are available for signaling.
I have to say I'm at a loss here as to what's next? Should I make a new BIP
or try to convince the authors of BIP141 to modify their BIP? Could someone
inform me on the next part of the process?
On Tue, Apr 11, 2017 at 8:25 AM, Sancho Panza via bitcoin-dev <
bitcoin-dev at lists.linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
> Tom Zander wrote:
>
> > The version field is still needed to actually allow future block version
> upgrades. We would cut off our road forward if that were to be blocked.
>
> I tend to agree, if all 32 bits were given up to grinding.
>
> But it's worth pointing out that BIP9 is purely informational, and the top
> 3 bits are still reserved for other purposes. One of them could perhaps be
> used to signal for an extended version field somewhere else, leaving the
> bottom 29 as entropy?
>
> Not a direction I prefer, but just a technical possibility perhaps.
>
> _______________________________________________
> bitcoin-dev mailing list
> bitcoin-dev at lists.linuxfoundation.org
> https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/attachments/20170411/4b967431/attachment.html>;
Jimmy Song [ARCHIVE] /
npub17wā¦3nc05
2023-06-07 17:59:54
in reply to nevent1qā¦m424
Author Public Key
npub17w8rw3wtcr03zdsdjhmcj37w0g6l79gsspleltsznexdktv0qw0qd3nc05Published at
2023-06-07 17:59:54Event JSON
{
"id": "3977372d189add82868bc973ab9ffc481f4a061477df7935bf97f02011027169",
"pubkey": "f38e3745cbc0df11360d95f78947ce7a35ff1510807f9fae029e4cdb2d8f039e",
"created_at": 1686160794,
"kind": 1,
"tags": [
[
"e",
"b3abda28c58fcdd36a7f3d79347d12387effc8cb5f326fca3c05e821d4348755",
"",
"root"
],
[
"e",
"c698649418ab0844bdb802a6ea6aeb4ce8dbf592171ca9ece5370fe775b0d549",
"",
"reply"
],
[
"p",
"a9caed86d21b3cc6356c289ed2aeb2c219bf1d6b85255c98a935d53b4377ef20"
]
],
"content": "š
Original date posted:2017-04-11\nš Original message:I've changed the proposal so only 8 bits are given to grinding so something\nlike 20 bits are available for signaling.\n\nI have to say I'm at a loss here as to what's next? Should I make a new BIP\nor try to convince the authors of BIP141 to modify their BIP? Could someone\ninform me on the next part of the process?\n\nOn Tue, Apr 11, 2017 at 8:25 AM, Sancho Panza via bitcoin-dev \u003c\nbitcoin-dev at lists.linuxfoundation.org\u003e wrote:\n\n\u003e Tom Zander wrote:\n\u003e\n\u003e \u003e The version field is still needed to actually allow future block version\n\u003e upgrades. We would cut off our road forward if that were to be blocked.\n\u003e\n\u003e I tend to agree, if all 32 bits were given up to grinding.\n\u003e\n\u003e But it's worth pointing out that BIP9 is purely informational, and the top\n\u003e 3 bits are still reserved for other purposes. One of them could perhaps be\n\u003e used to signal for an extended version field somewhere else, leaving the\n\u003e bottom 29 as entropy?\n\u003e\n\u003e Not a direction I prefer, but just a technical possibility perhaps.\n\u003e\n\u003e _______________________________________________\n\u003e bitcoin-dev mailing list\n\u003e bitcoin-dev at lists.linuxfoundation.org\n\u003e https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev\n\u003e\n\u003e\n-------------- next part --------------\nAn HTML attachment was scrubbed...\nURL: \u003chttp://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/attachments/20170411/4b967431/attachment.html\u003e",
"sig": "8ae7cf963a89877a2d84dfe74d70bd24569739981d89c9c37444859e17510361bbb84e523e7105cf5fd5ade2c79d482ccb81c177c5ee3e34d1e6f7cc961cb9ac"
}