Melvin Carvalho [ARCHIVE] on Nostr: 📅 Original date posted:2013-06-06 📝 Original message:There was a discussion on ...
📅 Original date posted:2013-06-06
📝 Original message:There was a discussion on #bitcon-dev yesterday
I stated that it would be impractical to generate two bitcoin addresses,
such that they differed in exactly one character (modulo different
checksums).
The corollary to this is that if you find an address with a verifiable
signature. Changing one character of that address would have no known
private key, and hence be normally undependable.
Does that sound correct?
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <
http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/attachments/20130606/4bd0ab7f/attachment.html>
Published at
2023-06-07 15:02:57Event JSON
{
"id": "3bf0bfddc0409cc556c68d2eb050c2bc5ca44715c8bf11ca4563a956e7d149cc",
"pubkey": "e316966328c4cb66c34719ef9a7b3bc54ef601663ad4ab06185991237735aa19",
"created_at": 1686150177,
"kind": 1,
"tags": [
[
"e",
"66074ead67ccf6438fc240f4217c6927b63f5e2c8bbd5874dd3ba9a36e6f6228",
"",
"reply"
],
[
"p",
"a23dbf6c6cc83e14cc3df4e56cc71845f611908084cfe620e83e40c06ccdd3d0"
]
],
"content": "📅 Original date posted:2013-06-06\n📝 Original message:There was a discussion on #bitcon-dev yesterday\n\nI stated that it would be impractical to generate two bitcoin addresses,\nsuch that they differed in exactly one character (modulo different\nchecksums).\n\nThe corollary to this is that if you find an address with a verifiable\nsignature. Changing one character of that address would have no known\nprivate key, and hence be normally undependable.\n\nDoes that sound correct?\n-------------- next part --------------\nAn HTML attachment was scrubbed...\nURL: \u003chttp://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/attachments/20130606/4bd0ab7f/attachment.html\u003e",
"sig": "8245a8d87992b255c3ea95d711fddf5d61bb0be13e500108a2e4b1c615db2285f31385e67de3eea0285e33f275cfc17d532883113fe8997bbe7745b874686eb7"
}