Comte de Sats Germain on Nostr: I didn't realize that 8 isn't 4. So 52 is probably wrong. I only say probably because ...
I didn't realize that 8 isn't 4. So 52 is probably wrong. I only say probably because there's no rule stated that the first number has to be the iteration of a sequence.
Published at
2025-05-02 19:22:03Event JSON
{
"id": "34896b9cbf4a5eea14999761d3b1bdc8314c5d100ee0b0a30c395a8f27e75f88",
"pubkey": "55f573b651eff351db57b0601d23022d8c532f9825db10a5733ebf39be4aa21b",
"created_at": 1746213723,
"kind": 1,
"tags": [
[
"e",
"050fdc2c02ab869501d4745b3c4589ddccad625a655d9c82a0b9bc75e5098be1",
"",
"root"
],
[
"e",
"ed1aefdb4070b80776043baf39627740906568f20b737526fb4fc405482b6e04",
"",
"reply"
],
[
"p",
"6596d001dc9ee0ae9b92907dc90054620984a221389a89e8ecd4660844e1e5ed"
],
[
"p",
"678a308e59c24ee1b342b0fe9abdf6fdfa5dccc30aeb275a537e1f7fa0609fbc"
]
],
"content": "I didn't realize that 8 isn't 4. So 52 is probably wrong. I only say probably because there's no rule stated that the first number has to be the iteration of a sequence.",
"sig": "f2d5d98b61256383b8a0c16098967d2660a3a4ba7401be58d73d7d7037eda1e7da13d69922caa17a67274e8fdddf70a089ae00e11612dedf004915354f66e2d4"
}
