📅 Original date posted:2015-07-30
📝 Original message:
I’m not entirely clear on how you intended to use OP_CAT.
I was thinking something along the lines of
<block hash> <partial merkle tree for transaction> <transaction> OP_CHECKSPVPROOFVERIFY OP_DROP
- Eric
> On Jul 29, 2015, at 6:19 PM, Rusty Russell <rusty at rustcorp.com.au> wrote:
>
> Eric Lombrozo <elombrozo at gmail.com> writes:
>> I don’t know if anyone has done any research or published anything in
>> this regard, but one of the major issues with bitcoin I’ve been trying
>> to solve is how to properly incentivize nodes to construct SPV proofs.
>
> This can almost be done via P2SH, but not quite:
>
> 1) OP_CAT is disabled :(
> 2) The txlen limit might bite, I'd have to do the maths.
>
> Cheers,
> Rusty.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 842 bytes
Desc: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
URL: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/lightning-dev/attachments/20150729/04d17efb/attachment.sig>;
Eric Lombrozo [ARCHIVE] /
npub1az…t2krq
2023-06-09 12:43:49
in reply to nevent1q…nx2l
Author Public Key
npub1azvhdrf9fu6n0tm7yez4j6zcxcedp2ct6nrcq3z74naqs7kgpk8s5t2krqPublished at
2023-06-09 12:43:49Event JSON
{
"id": "3483a54d1bbe845e6a2127e8bd17f2eeca859f89e6becbee12954b105fc4a63a",
"pubkey": "e899768d254f3537af7e26455968583632d0ab0bd4c780445eacfa087ac80d8f",
"created_at": 1686314629,
"kind": 1,
"tags": [
[
"e",
"c6c865d051bdbf3f30d2db24241200b1e124d1cea3e3498255201c53fd0fb2b6",
"",
"root"
],
[
"e",
"5017c458daccda4e567232acdaed72f14eb8b3a00d8fdf7f6f97c854116a0fc9",
"",
"reply"
],
[
"p",
"13bd8c1c5e3b3508a07c92598647160b11ab0deef4c452098e223e443c1ca425"
]
],
"content": "📅 Original date posted:2015-07-30\n📝 Original message:\nI’m not entirely clear on how you intended to use OP_CAT.\n\nI was thinking something along the lines of\n\n\u003cblock hash\u003e \u003cpartial merkle tree for transaction\u003e \u003ctransaction\u003e OP_CHECKSPVPROOFVERIFY OP_DROP\n\n\n\n- Eric\n\n\n\u003e On Jul 29, 2015, at 6:19 PM, Rusty Russell \u003crusty at rustcorp.com.au\u003e wrote:\n\u003e \n\u003e Eric Lombrozo \u003celombrozo at gmail.com\u003e writes:\n\u003e\u003e I don’t know if anyone has done any research or published anything in\n\u003e\u003e this regard, but one of the major issues with bitcoin I’ve been trying\n\u003e\u003e to solve is how to properly incentivize nodes to construct SPV proofs.\n\u003e \n\u003e This can almost be done via P2SH, but not quite:\n\u003e \n\u003e 1) OP_CAT is disabled :(\n\u003e 2) The txlen limit might bite, I'd have to do the maths.\n\u003e \n\u003e Cheers,\n\u003e Rusty.\n\n-------------- next part --------------\nA non-text attachment was scrubbed...\nName: signature.asc\nType: application/pgp-signature\nSize: 842 bytes\nDesc: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail\nURL: \u003chttp://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/lightning-dev/attachments/20150729/04d17efb/attachment.sig\u003e",
"sig": "8df4c6206f4a78c3328c0109c9476909af54c668c42dd6140213ace2a005562c503a3058e3f007713f0a555d777df5a0e916c4c9bd151c6aad3a9c94b4799d5b"
}