š
Original date posted:2017-09-05
š Original message:On 05.09.2017 09:10, shiva sitamraju via bitcoin-dev wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Thanks Thomas. The procedure described in
> http://docs.electrum.org/en/latest/seedphrase.html is really what I was
> looking for ! I really don't see any point of following BIP49, If possible
> it would be great if you can propose an alternative to BIP49 that follows
> similar structure to what is used in electrum.
>
> I have proposed following changes to BIP32 serialization format
> https://github.com/bitcoin/bips/blob/master/bip-0032.mediawiki#serialization-format
> to differentiate segwit xpub/xprv. Below the list of new version bytes,
> resulting base58 prefix and network type:
>
> 0x042393df , sxpr , segwit mainnet private key
> 0x04239377 , sxpb , segwit mainnet public key
> 0x04222463 , stpb , segwit testnet public key
> 0x042224cc , stpr , segwit testnet private key
>
I have proposed a similar idea, with letters z,y,z combined with pub/prv
(see the electrum documentation page)
The point is that we need 3 types of keys, not 2, because there are two
types of segwit output scripts: native and nested in p2sh.
We could use t,u,v for testnet.
Thomas Voegtlin [ARCHIVE] /
npub10fā¦7ej47
2023-06-07 18:05:16
in reply to nevent1qā¦v6mx
Author Public Key
npub10f96gqrsu4qpygfgvuvzce47aavjvql703egfde0l2hua8dzpszs67ej47Published at
2023-06-07 18:05:16Event JSON
{
"id": "34e820aa1d6755b47f740ffacc11ecdd95c95bdf12690640f8822f5081353f42",
"pubkey": "7a4ba40070e54012212867182c66beef592603fe7c7284b72ffaafce9da20c05",
"created_at": 1686161116,
"kind": 1,
"tags": [
[
"e",
"46b44a34d77fcd68c66c473be695da22e57d2f60e66adebec21f1b5ec82f088c",
"",
"root"
],
[
"e",
"253384327a06016e1d4f0d27c819918c8d4497255f096dccc5505869a035f678",
"",
"reply"
],
[
"p",
"7631397e469f47f3535567311f5f7c17129e0ff2cb253df015e3d92ddfd92c63"
]
],
"content": "š
Original date posted:2017-09-05\nš Original message:On 05.09.2017 09:10, shiva sitamraju via bitcoin-dev wrote:\n\u003e Hi,\n\u003e \n\u003e Thanks Thomas. The procedure described in\n\u003e http://docs.electrum.org/en/latest/seedphrase.html is really what I was\n\u003e looking for ! I really don't see any point of following BIP49, If possible\n\u003e it would be great if you can propose an alternative to BIP49 that follows\n\u003e similar structure to what is used in electrum.\n\u003e \n\u003e I have proposed following changes to BIP32 serialization format\n\u003e https://github.com/bitcoin/bips/blob/master/bip-0032.mediawiki#serialization-format\n\u003e to differentiate segwit xpub/xprv. Below the list of new version bytes,\n\u003e resulting base58 prefix and network type:\n\u003e \n\u003e 0x042393df , sxpr , segwit mainnet private key\n\u003e 0x04239377 , sxpb , segwit mainnet public key\n\u003e 0x04222463 , stpb , segwit testnet public key\n\u003e 0x042224cc , stpr , segwit testnet private key\n\u003e \n\nI have proposed a similar idea, with letters z,y,z combined with pub/prv\n(see the electrum documentation page)\n\nThe point is that we need 3 types of keys, not 2, because there are two\ntypes of segwit output scripts: native and nested in p2sh.\n\nWe could use t,u,v for testnet.",
"sig": "5b8d70f600109c76861e8daf35e41df489d530f950787ed8b1dfc41bbc700f007fff5a1fe727ea542210280f53fb2f66c07585254eb29ec3c9c54ccd793ccab8"
}