Peter Todd [ARCHIVE] on Nostr: 📅 Original date posted:2013-05-08 📝 Original message:On Thu, May 09, 2013 at ...

📅 Original date posted:2013-05-08
📝 Original message:On Thu, May 09, 2013 at 09:39:10AM +1000, Addy Yeow wrote:
> Hi list,
>
> Can someone explain why do we have 32-bit and 64-bit timestamp fields
> instead of all being 64-bit?
>
> https://en.bitcoin.it/wiki/Protocol_specification

Who knows?

Satoshi used 32-bits and those fields can't be changed now without every
single Bitcoin user changing all at once. (a "hard-fork" change)

We'll probably need to do one of those eventually for other reasons, so
we might as well leave fixing the timestamps until then.

--
'peter'[:-1]@petertodd.org
000000000000002a9a85a940c4da2951c3e91a043a44805fa286b336364d9daa
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 490 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/attachments/20130508/06a79d4c/attachment.sig>;